Table 1. PERMANOVAs to test for effects of HW simulations on absolute assemblage structure.
PERMANOVAs to test for differences in multivariate assemblage structure (after Phase 3) between HW Timings and HW Magnitudes based on absolute abundance data. Permutations (4,999 under a reduced model) were based on Bray-Curtis similarity matrices constructed from square-root transformed abundance data. Main tests were conducted on both the 1-week (A) and 2-week (B) HW duration experiments separately. Significant P values (at P < 0.05) are shown in bold. Significant Magnitude/Magnitude × Timing interaction effects were investigated further with post-hoc pairwise comparisons.
Source | df | SS | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
(A) | ||||
Magnitude | 3 | 1,226 | 1.88 | 0.010 |
Timing | 2 | 2,7267 | 62.87 | 0.001 |
Ma × Ti | 6 | 1,313 | 1.01 | 0.485 |
Residual | 52 | 11,276 | ||
Total | 63 | 41,467 | ||
Post-hoc tests for Magnitude: FC ≠ C & T2, C ≠ T2 | ||||
(B) | ||||
Magnitude | 3 | 2,420 | 4.25 | 0.001 |
Timing | 2 | 25,517 | 67.20 | 0.001 |
Ma × Ti | 6 | 2,101 | 1.85 | 0.001 |
Residual | 52 | 9,872 | ||
Total | 63 | 40,312 | ||
Post-hoc tests for Ma × Ti: | ||||
Timing 1: FC ≠ C & T1 & T2 | ||||
Timing 2: FC ≠ C & T1 & T2, C ≠ T1 & T2 | ||||
Timing 3: FC ≠ C & T1 & T2 |