Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2015 Jan 9;169(4):572–578.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.023

Table 3.

Comparison of ROC results for each method for A) ACS and B) UAP. Both sTnI and hsTnI had superior area under the curve (AUC) to cTn for diagnosis or exclusion of each outcome at first and second draw; no difference in AUC was observed between sTnI and hsTnI.

A)

Time point AUC cTn AUC sTnI AUC hsTnI P value
cTn vs sTnI
P value
cTn vs hsTnI
Baseline 0.50 0.71 0.70 <0.001 <0.001
90–155 minutes 0.50 0.73 0.72 <0.001 <0.001
210–300 minutes 0.60 0.69 0.69 0.24 0.24
B)

Time point AUC cTn AUC sTnI AUC hsTnI P value
cTn vs sTnI
P value
cTn vs hsTnI
Baseline 0.50 0.63 0.63 0.008 0.01
90–155 minutes 0.50 0.65 0.64 0.01 0.02
210–300 minutes 0.55 0.63 0.63 0.40 0.40