Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0122515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122515

Table 2. Rankings of the reference genes based on geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper, showing both efficiency corrected and non-corrected data used in the original software and the refFinder output for the different algorithms, for the geNorm and NormFinder software.

FS1 samples geNorm NormFinder BestKeeper
Gene Efficiency No efficiency correction RefFinder Efficiency corrected No efficiency correction RefFinder Correlation Coefficient RefFinder
ACTB 13 13 13 13 12 12 14 1
B2M 9 1/2 1/2 9 9 9 4 12
GAPDH 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 13
HMBS 1/2 7 7 1 1 1 5 3
HPRT1 7 3 3 7 3 3 1 9
IGF1R 8 5 5 8 8 8 6 8
RLP13 14 14 14 14 14 14 12 14
RPS18 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 4
SDHA 1/2 9 9 4 4 4 8 2
SOX9 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10
TBP 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 6
TOP2B 6 1/2 1/2 5 6 6 2 11
UBC 3 6 6 3 5 5 7 7
VWHAZ 5 8 8 6 7 7 9 5
CIS samples geNorm NormFinder BestKeeper
Gene Efficiency No efficiency correction RefFinder Efficiency corrected No efficiency correction RefFinder Correlation Coefficient RefFinder
ACTB 4 1/2 1/2 2 3 3 7 4
B2M 11 8 8 11 10 10 10 12
GAPDH 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 11
HMBS 3 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 4 2
HPRT1 12 13 13 12 12 12 14 5
IGF1R 5 4 4 4 2 2 5 6
RLP13 13 10 10 13 13 13 9 13
RPS18 10 9 9 10 11 11 12 3
SDHA 6 3 3 6 4 4 6 1
SOX9 8 11 11 9 8 8 11 8
TBP 9 12 12 8 9 9 8 9
TOP2B 1/2 5 5 5 5 5 2 7
UBC 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 14
YWHAZ 1/2 6 6 3 6 6 3 10

Switches in ranking from the original algorithm are marked in bold. BestKeeper rankings are based on the correlation coefficient or on the RefFinder output which is only based on the standard deviation of the Cq values.