Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transpl Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 6;17(2):289–296. doi: 10.1111/tid.12351

Table 2.

Therapeutic approaches to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb)

Approach Advantages Limitations References
Monotherapy
Polymyxins Highly active in vitro
Mainstay against CRAb
Nephrotoxicity of colistin + calcineurin inhibitors
Unclear pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen
Emergence of resistance with monotherapy
(43, 44)
Tigecycline Highly active in vitro
Large volume of distribution
Tissue penetration
Increased mortality
Resistance during therapy
Inadequate serum and urine concentrations
(22, 29, 45)
Sulbactam Comparable to carbapenems for susceptible strains
Optimized with high dose and prolonged infusion
Co-resistance of sulbactam in CRAb (46)

Combination therapy
Carbapenem + polymyxins Favorable meta-analysis of in vitro data
Successful in organ transplant recipients
Controlled trials needed (22, 47)
Polymyxins + rifampin Randomized controlled trial: increased bacterial clearance No difference in 30-day mortality
Rifampin interacts vs. azoles, calcineurin/mTOR inhibitors
(48)
Polymyxins + fosfomycin Randomized controlled trial: favorable microbiological response Not powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes IV fosfomycin not available in the US (49)

mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; IV, intravenous; US, United States of America.