Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan 6;48(4):436–444. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.022

Table 3.

Associations between State and District Regular Soda Policy and High School Regular Soda Availability, 2010–2012a

Coefficientb (SE) p

Separate non-mediation multivariate total association analysesc
  State mandated soda ban → School soda availability −1.256 (0.399) 0.002
  District mandated soda ban → School soda availability −0.808 (0.561) 0.150
1-1-1 Multivariate mediation analyses
  Level 1 State mandated soda ban
  Level 1 District mandated soda ban
  Level 1 School soda availability
  a State ban → District ban   0.559 (0.068) 0.000
  b District ban → School soda availability −0.264 (0.658) 0.689
  c State ban → School soda availability −1.117 (0.557) 0.045
  a*b Mediation or indirect effect −0.147 (0.374) 0.694
a

Models clustered by sample design strata and were weighted to indicate the percentage of U.S. public high school students attending schools within districts or states with the specified characteristics. All models simultaneously controlled for school characteristics (grade, student body racial/ethnic distribution, percentage of student body eligible for free and reduced price lunch, school enrollment, population density), as well as state characteristics (percent White population, population density, adolescent obesity rates, region) and year. Unweighted n = 243.

b

Boldface for coefficients indicates significant p values.

c

Models examining total associations run separately for state and district bans.