Table 5.
Coefficientb | (SE) | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
African American High School Students | ||||
Separate non-mediation multivariate total association analysesc | ||||
State mandated ban → Student consumption | −0.077 | (0.110) | 0.482 | |
School soda availability → Student consumption | 0.291 | (0.127) | 0.022 | |
2-2-1 Multivariate mediation analyses | ||||
Level 2 State mandated soda ban | ||||
Level 2 School soda availability | ||||
Level 1 Student daily soda consumption | ||||
a | State ban → School soda availability | −0.263 | (0.077) | 0.001 |
b | School soda availability → Student consumption | 0.326 | (0.070) | 0.000 |
c | State ban → Student consumption | 0.025 | (0.140) | 0.860 |
a*b | Mediation or indirect effect | −0.086 | (0.034) | 0.011 |
Models clustered by school and sample design strata and included the sample design weight as a grand mean centered covariate. All models simultaneously controlled for Level 1 student characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, average parental education), Level 2 school characteristics (grade, percentage of student body eligible for free and reduced price lunch, total enrollment, population density), and Level 2 state characteristics (percent White population, population density, adolescent obesity rates, region) and year.
Level 1 n = 809; Level 2 n = 152.
Bold font for coefficients indicates significant p values.
Models examining total associations run separately for state bans and school availability.