Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Perinatol. 2014 Nov 20;35(4):246–251. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.197

Table 3.

Odds of antidepressant use among visits for pregnant women and depressed pregnant women

Visits for pregnant women Visits for depressed pregnant women
Adjusted* OR (95% CI) Adjusted* OR (95% CI)
Race/Ethnicity
 White*** Ref Ref
 Non-White 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.5 (0.3, 0.9)
Age categories
 < 25 0.7 (0.4, 1.2) 0.9 (0.4, 1.9)
 25 – 29 Ref Ref
 30 – 34 0.9 (0.5, 1.6) 0.6 (0.3, 1.5)
 > 34 0.7 (0.4, 1.4) 1.5 (0.7, 3.4)
Insurance status
 Other** 1.7 (0.9, 3.0) 2.1 (0.6, 7.1)
 Private Ref Ref
 Medicaid 1.0 (0.5, 2.0) 1.0 (0.6, 1.8)
Region
 Northeast Ref Ref
 Midwest 1.2 (0.7, 2.3) 1.2 (0.6, 2.4)
 South 1.2 (0.6, 2.5) 0.9 (0.4, 2.1)
 West 0.5 (0.2, 1.1) 0.4 (0.2, 0.7)
Survey
 NAMCS 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) 1.6 (0.8, 3.0)
 NHAMCS Ref Ref
*

Models mutually adjusted for all listed variables.

**

Other = Medicare, worker’s compensation, self-pay, no charge and other

***

Race was collapsed to White vs. Non-White due to small sample sizes within Non-White groups (<30).

(White includes non-Hispanic White; Non-White includes Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Other)

Ref=Reference, OR=Odds Ratio, CI=Confidence Interval, NAMCS=National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, NHAMCS=National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey