Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 18;32(4):587–596. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0428-z

Table 3.

IVF stimulation cycle outcomes in cancer vs. controls

IVF parameters Cancer n (%) ± sd 65 cycles Control n (%) ± sd 122 cycles p-value
Protocol type LDL 39 (60.0) 102 (83.6) 0.0005
Flare 8 (12.3) 11 (9.0) 0.48
Antagonist 18 (27.7) 9 (7.4) 0.0004
Ampules of gonadotropin 38.0 ± 2.0 35.6 ± 1.5 0.28
Day of hCG administration 11.7 ± 0.2 11.9 ± 0.1 0.15
Peak E2 2049.9 ± 133.5 2162.2 ± 71.7 0.21
Number of oocytes 12.4 ± 7.8 10.9 ± 5.2 0.36
Insemination typea Regular 34 (57.6) 111 (91.0) <0.0001
ICSI 25 (42.4) 11 (9.0) <0.0001
Fertilization rate Overall 0.68 ± 0.3 0.74 ± 0.2 0.34
ICSI 0.77 ± 0.18 0.87 ± 0.18 0.052
Conventional 0.71 ± 0.25 0.73 ± 0.18 0.33
Number of 2pn embryos 6.6 ± 0.7 7.1 ± 0.4 0.11
Day of transferǂ Cancer (n) Control (fresh) (n) 0.013
2 2 8
3 15 72
5 0 42

aNot applicable for six patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation

ǂIncomplete data for cancer patients