Expectation	Group A	Group B	t-value	d	CI (95%) of d
Comparison 1 (5 vs. 7) (p = 0.33)	Threatened, securely attached participants should experience lower levels of loneliness if they wrote about comfort food as compared to if they wrote about new food.	5 (M = 1.88, SD = 0.43)	7 (M = 2.11, SD = 0.57)	t(190) = 0.97	0.32	[−0.33 to 0.97] Original study [−1.50 to 0.05]
Comparison 2 (7 vs. 8) (p = 0.32)	After writing about comfort food, threatened, securely attached participants should experience lower levels of loneliness as compared to insecurely attached.	7 (M = 2.11, SD = 0.57)	8 (M = 2.32, SD = 0.68)	t(190) = −1.0	−0.29	[−0.86 to 0.28] Original study [−2.40 to −0.77]
Comparison 3 (3 vs. 7) (p = 0.73)	After writing about comfort food, securely attached participants who underwent a belongingness threat should not differ in loneliness level from their counterparts in the no threat condition (null hypothesis).	3 (M = 2.02, SD = 0.49)	7 (M = 2.11, SD = 0.57)	t(190) = −0.35	−0.12	[−0.80 to 0.56] Original study [−0.44 to 1.08]
Comparison 4 *new* (1 vs. 5) (p = 0.85)	Those asked to write about a belongingness threat should report greater loneliness levels, as compared to those who wrote about things in their apartment.	1 (M = 1.92, SD = 0.59)	5 (M = 1.88, SD = 0.43)	t(190) = −0.19	−0.06	[−0.73 to 0.60] Original study [−0.16 to 1.63]