Expectation	Group A	Group B	t-value	d	CI (95%) of d
Comparison 1 (5 vs. 7) (p =0.98)	Threatened, securely attached participants should experience lower levels of loneliness if they wrote about comfort food as compared to if they wrote about new food.	5 (M = 1.65, SD = 0.28)	7 (M = 1.65, SD = 0.36)	t(167) = 0.02	0.007	[−0.27 to 0.27] Original study [−1.50 to 0.05]
Comparison 2 (7 vs. 8) (p = 0.001)	After writing about comfort food, threatened, securely attached participants should experience lower levels of loneliness as compared to insecurely attached.	7 (M = 1.65, SD = 0.36)	8 (M = 2.18, SD = 0.69)	t(167) = −3.32	−1.03	[−1.67 to −0.38] Original study [−2.40 to −0.77]
Comparison 3 (3 vs. 7) (p = 0.54)	After writing about comfort food, securely attached participants who underwent a belongingness threat should not differ in loneliness level from their counterparts in the no threat condition (null hypothesis).	3 (M = 1.74, SD = 0.36)	7 (M = 1.65, SD = 0.36)	t(167) = 0.61	0.18	[−0.40 to 0.76] Original study [−0.44 to 1.08]
Comparison 4 *new* (1 vs. 5) (p = 0.73)	Those asked to experience belongingness threat should report greater loneliness levels, as compared to those who did not experience the threat.	1 (M = 1.71, SD = 0.29)	5 (M = 1.65, SD = 0.28)	t(167) = −0.34	−0.11	[−0.77 to 0.54] Original study [−0.16 to 1.63]