Expectation	Group A	Group B	t-value	d13	CI (95%) of d
Comparison 1 (5 vs. 7) (p = 0.12)	Threatened, securely attached participants should experience lower levels of loneliness if they wrote about comfort food as compared to if they wrote about new food.	5 (M = 2.14, SD = 0.77)	7 (M = 1.81, SD = 0.72)	t(358) = −1.58	−0.38	[−0.86 to 0.10] Original study [−1.50 to 0.05]
Comparison 2 (7 vs. 8) (p = 0.001)	After writing about comfort food, threatened, securely attached participants should experience lower levels of loneliness as compared to insecurely attached.	7 (M = 1.81, SD = 0.7214)	8 (M = 2.83, SD = 0.9115)	t(358) = −6.47	−1.20	[−1.59 to −0.80] Original study [−2.40 to −0.77]
Comparison 3 (3 vs. 7) (p = 0.16)	After writing about comfort food, securely attached participants who underwent a belongingness threat should not differ in loneliness level from their counterparts in the no threat condition (null hypothesis).	3 (M = 1.57, SD = 0.58)	7 (M = 1.81, SD = 0.72)	t(358) = −1.40	−0.28	[−0.68 to 0.12] Original study [−0.44 to 1.08]
Comparison 4 *new* (1 vs. 5) (p = 0.12)	Those asked to write about a belongingness threat should report greater loneliness levels, as compared to those who wrote about things in their apartment.	1 (M = 1.70, SD = 0.67)	5 (M = 2.14, SD = 0.77)	t(358) = 1.58	0.52	[−0.13 to 1.17] Original study [−0.16 to 1.63]