TABLE 3.
Multinomial logistic regression analysis to examine the associations of mothers’ child-feeding practices with child’s SSB intake: IFPS II Year 6 Follow-up Study, 20121
SSB intake during the past month at 6 y of age by child’s weight status |
||||||
Underweight/normal-weight children |
Overweight/obese children |
|||||
Mothers’ child-feeding practices2 | n | >0 to <1 time/d | ≥1 time/d | n | >0 to <1 time/d | ≥1 time/d |
Make sure that my child does not eat too many sweets or junk foods | 904 | 275 | ||||
No | 102 | Reference | Reference | 41 | Reference | Reference |
Yes | 802 | 0.77 (0.41, 1.42) | 0.29 (0.15, 0.58)3 | 234 | 0.37 (0.08, 1.70) | 0.16 (0.03, 0.79)3 |
If I did not guide or regulate my child’s eating, my child would eat too much of his/her favorite foods | 904 | 275 | ||||
No | 301 | Reference | Reference | 72 | Reference | Reference |
Yes | 603 | 1.46 (1.03, 2.09)3 | 2.03 (1.25, 3.29)3 | 203 | 1.63 (0.74, 3.58) | 1.18 (0.47, 2.95) |
Especially careful to make sure my child eats enough | 904 | 275 | ||||
No | 317 | Reference | Reference | 113 | Reference | Reference |
Yes | 587 | 1.12 (0.77, 1.62) | 1.24 (0.75, 2.04) | 162 | 1.75 (0.79, 3.90) | 2.09 (0.81, 5.38) |
Encourage my 6-y-old to eat all of the food on his/her plate | 904 | 275 | ||||
No | 369 | Reference | Reference | 132 | Reference | Reference |
Yes | 535 | 1.21 (0.84, 1.73) | 1.11 (0.69, 1.79) | 143 | 0.79 (0.37, 1.69) | 1.02 (0.41, 2.51) |
Values are adjusted ORs (95% CIs) unless otherwise indicated, n = 1179. All 4 mothers’ child-feeding practices variables were included in one model and adjusted for child’s sex, maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal education, marital status, annual household income, and maternal weight status. SSBs include regular soda, sweetened drinks such as Kool-Aid (Kraft Foods, Inc.), lemonade, sweet tea, Hi-C (Coca-Cola Company), cranberry cocktail, Gatorade (Gatorade, Inc.), and others. The reference group was SSB intake of 0 times/d. IFPS, Infant Feeding Practices Study.
“No” included “1,” “2,” and “3” on the Likert scale and “yes” included “4” and “5” on the Likert scale.
CIs that did not include 1.