Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 4;101(4):824–834. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.098988

TABLE 3.

Association between dietary ω-3 PUFA intake and endometrial cancer risk in the WHI Observational Study and Clinical Trials (n = 87,360)1

Energy-adjusted quintiles of fatty acid intake
1 2 3 4 5 P-trend
ω-3 Fatty acids
 EPA + DPA + DHA, mg/d ≤56.8 56.9–91.2 91.3–133.9 134.0–205.2 >205.2
  Cases, n 267 238 271 241 236
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 0.96 (0.81, 1.15) 1.09 (0.92, 1.30) 0.95 (0.80, 1.14) 0.92 (0.77, 1.09) 0.353
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 0.98 (0.80, 1.20) 1.03 (0.84, 1.26) 0.90 (0.73, 1.11) 0.81 (0.66, 1.00) 0.040
 EPA (20:5ω-3), mg/d ≤15.6 15.7–27.4 27.5–41.3 41.4–63.6 >63.6
  Cases, n 262 253 244 266 228
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) 1.00 (0.84, 1.20) 1.08 (0.91, 1.28) 0.91 (0.76, 1.08) 0.427
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 1.09 (0.89, 1.33) 0.96 (0.78, 1.18) 1.00 (0.81, 1.22) 0.81 (0.65, 1.01) 0.043
 DPA (22:5ω-3), mg/d ≤6.8 6.9–10.7 10.8–15.2 15.3–22.2 >22.2
  Cases, n 271 252 248 242 240
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (0.84, 1.19) 0.98 (0.82, 1.17) 0.94 (0.79, 1.12) 0.92 (0.77, 1.09) 0.239
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 1.03 (0.84, 1.26) 0.95 (0.78, 1.17) 0.81 (0.66, 1.00) 0.85 (0.69, 1.05) 0.019
 DHA (22:6ω-3), mg/d ≤32.8 32.9–51.9 52.0–76.8 76.9–121.0 >121.0
  Cases, n 283 232 263 236 239
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 0.89 (0.74, 1.06) 1.00 (0.84, 1.19) 0.88 (0.74, 1.05) 0.87 (0.74, 1.04) 0.157
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 0.91 (0.74, 1.11) 0.97 (0.79, 1.18) 0.81 (0.66, 1.00) 0.77 (0.63, 0.95) 0.010
 ALA (18:3ω-3), mg/d ≤921.6 921.7–1130.6 1130.7–1333.1 1333.2–1640.0 >1640.0
  Cases, n 285 244 221 241 236
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 0.93 (0.78, 1.11) 0.85 (0.71, 1.02) 0.92 (0.77, 1.09) 0.96 (0.81, 1.13) 0.604
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 0.94 (0.77, 1.15) 0.83 (0.67, 1.02) 0.98 (0.80, 1.21) 0.96 (0.79, 1.18) 0.900
ω-6 Fatty acids
 LA + AA, mg/d ≤8328.5 8328.6–10,061.7 10,061.8–11,539.7 11,539.8–13,494.5 >13,494.5
  Cases, n 270 234 229 242 278
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 0.93 (0.78, 1.12) 0.93 (0.78, 1.12) 0.98 (0.82, 1.18) 1.08 (0.91, 1.27) 0.296
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 0.81 (0.66, 1.00) 0.88 (0.72, 1.09) 0.94 (0.76, 1.17) 1.09 (0.89, 1.34) 0.180
 LA (18:2ω-6), mg/d ≤8235.9 8236.0–9962.1 9962.2–11,438.1 11,438.2–13,391.3 >13,391.3
  Cases, n 270 234 230 242 277
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 0.93 (0.78, 1.12) 0.94 (0.78, 1.12) 0.99 (0.83, 1.18) 1.07 (0.91, 1.27) 0.315
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 0.79 (0.64, 0.98) 0.88 (0.71, 1.08) 0.93 (0.76, 1.15) 1.08 (0.88, 1.32) 0.216
 AA (20:4ω-6), mg/d ≤61.5 61.6–80.9 81.0–99.8 99.9–127.5 >127.5
  Cases, n 304 238 229 225 257
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 0.84 (0.70, 0.99) 0.81 (0.68, 0.97) 0.80 (0.67, 0.95) 0.90 (0.76, 1.06) 0.163
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 0.78 (0.64, 0.95) 0.77 (0.63, 0.94) 0.71 (0.58, 0.87) 0.75 (0.61, 0.91) 0.002
ω-3:ω-6
 Ratio of EPA + DPA + DHA to LA + AA, mg/d ≤0.005 0.006–0.008 0.009–0.013 0.014–0.021 >0.021
  Cases, n 269 248 241 259 236
  HR (95% CI)2 1.00 (reference) 1.01 (0.84, 1.20) 0.97 (0.81, 1.15) 1.02 (0.85, 1.21) 0.90 (0.75, 1.07) 0.292
  HR (95% CI)3 1.00 (reference) 0.99 (0.80, 1.21) 0.92 (0.75, 1.13) 0.94 (0.76, 1.15) 0.81 (0.65, 1.00) 0.053
1

P-trend values were calculated by treating categorical exposure variables as continuous in regression models. AA, arachidonic acid; ALA, α-linolenic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; LA, linoleic acid; WHI, Women’s Health Initiative.

2

Derived from Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age (time variable) and total energy.

3

Further adjusted for clinical trial/observational study intervention assignment, US region, race, education, BMI, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, age at menarche, age at first birth, age at menopause, parity, duration of combined menopausal hormone therapy, duration of estrogen-alone hormone therapy, duration of oral contraceptive use, oophoerectomy status, family history of endometrial cancer, and history of diabetes.