Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2009 May-Jun;34(5):815–823. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.018

Table 4. Comparison of Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2) Scores for Surgical vs. Non-Surgical Subjects.

AIMS2 Scale Preoperative 6-Month
Postoperative
1-Year
Postoperative
Adjusted Effect
Size*
(Baseline)
Adjusted Effect
Size**
(Baseline &
Covariates)
SMPA Non-
SMPA
SMPA Non-
SMPA
SMPA Non-
SMPA
Effect
Size
p-value Effect
Size
p-value
Physical 4.0 (2) 2.4 (2) 3.4 (2) 2.5 (2) 3.3 (2) 2.4 (2) 0.24 0.261 0.28 0.241
Affect 4.1 (2) 3.0 (2) 3.7 (2) 2.7 (2) 3.7 (2) 2.7 (2) 0.03 0.895 0.23 0.343
Symptom 5.6 (3) 4.3 (2) 5.1 (3) 4.0 (3) 4.8 (3) 4.0 (3) 0.30 0.367 0.14 0.716
Social interaction 4.2 (2) 3.6 (1) 3.9 (2) 3.7 (1) 3.9 (2) 3.5 (1) 0.10 0.637 0.20 0.397

Abbreviations: SMPA, Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty.

Cell values are means (SD).

*

Mean difference in the response variable (1 year change score) between the SMPA and Non-SMPA group, adjusting for the centered baseline values of the response variable.

**

Mean difference in the response variable (1 year change score) between the SMPA and Non-SMPA group, adjusting for the centered baseline value of the response variable, centered age, centered severity, education (high school and lower versus higher), and gender.

For all AIMS2 subscales, higher scores correspond to worse outcome.