Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;10(4):e0122332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122332

Table 4. Segmentation performance of different possible combinations of three enhancement methods (LP, WL, FR) and three segmentation methods (GC, TV, LS) on the ARIA dataset.

LP, WL and FR denote local phase, wavelet and Frangi’s eigenvalue based enhancement filters respectively. GC, TV and LS denote graph cut, total variation and level set based segmentation methods respectively. Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; Acc: accuracy; AUC: area under the curve.

Enhancement Segmentation Se Sp Acc AUC Seg. Time (s) Entire Time (s)
LP GC 0.751 0.930 0.920 0.841 0.6 4.6
TV 0.712 0.921 0.919 0.817 16.5 20.5
LS 0.677 0.924 0.921 0.801 22.9 26.9
WL GC 0.736 0.920 0.912 0.830 0.6 5.6
TV 0.689 0.922 0.916 0.802 16.5 21.5
LS 0.695 0.929 0.928 0.811 22.9 27.9
FR GC 0.717 0.934 0.921 0.776 0.6 19.7
TV 0.712 0.893 0.921 0.807 16.5 35.6
LS 0.694 0.927 0.939 0.811 22.9 42.0