Table 5. Segmentation performance of different possible combinations of three enhancement methods (LP, WL, FR) and three segmentation methods (GC, TV, LS) on the VAMPIRE dataset.
Enhancement | Segmentation | Se | Sp | Acc | AUC | Seg. Time (s) | Entire Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LP | GC | 0.721 | 0.984 | 0.976 | 0.853 | 2.5 | 12.5 |
TV | 0.701 | 0.985 | 0.976 | 0.843 | 30.2 | 40.2 | |
LS | 0.715 | 0.984 | 0.976 | 0.850 | 48.3 | 58.3 | |
WL | GC | 0.708 | 0.975 | 0.967 | 0.842 | 2.5 | 15.5 |
TV | 0.687 | 0.981 | 0.957 | 0.813 | 30.2 | 43.2 | |
LS | 0.722 | 0.981 | 0.960 | 0.851 | 48.3 | 61.3 | |
FR | GC | 0.665 | 0.967 | 0.957 | 0.816 | 2.5 | 30.5 |
TV | 0.608 | 0.980 | 0.939 | 0.799 | 30.2 | 58.2 | |
LS | 0.705 | 0.986 | 0.950 | 0.846 | 48.3 | 76.3 |