Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;10(4):e0122332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122332

Table 5. Segmentation performance of different possible combinations of three enhancement methods (LP, WL, FR) and three segmentation methods (GC, TV, LS) on the VAMPIRE dataset.

LP, WL and FR denote local phase, wavelet and Frangi’s eigenvalue based enhancement filters respectively. GC, TV and LS denote graph cut, total variation and level set based segmentation methods respectively. Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; Acc: accuracy; AUC: area under the curve.

Enhancement Segmentation Se Sp Acc AUC Seg. Time (s) Entire Time (s)
LP GC 0.721 0.984 0.976 0.853 2.5 12.5
TV 0.701 0.985 0.976 0.843 30.2 40.2
LS 0.715 0.984 0.976 0.850 48.3 58.3
WL GC 0.708 0.975 0.967 0.842 2.5 15.5
TV 0.687 0.981 0.957 0.813 30.2 43.2
LS 0.722 0.981 0.960 0.851 48.3 61.3
FR GC 0.665 0.967 0.957 0.816 2.5 30.5
TV 0.608 0.980 0.939 0.799 30.2 58.2
LS 0.705 0.986 0.950 0.846 48.3 76.3