Table 2.

Genetically Moderated Indirect Effects

Indirect path	DRD4 7−		DRD4 7+		χ2(df)
	Indirect effect	Total effect	Indirect effect	Total effect
1. C-Conflict → APIC → TA	.087*	.297	.021	.221	5.74(2)
2. C-Positivity → APIP → TA	.031	.031	−.050†	−.050	11.13(2)*
3. C-Conflict → APIP → TA	−.016	−.016	.053†	.053	6.79(2)*
4. C-Positivity → APIC → TA	−.052*	−.051	−.003	−.003	5.00(2)
5. APIC → TA → Internalizing	.075*	.075	.014	.014	3.70(2)
6. APIP → TA → Internalizing	.023	.023	−.066*	−.066	6.79(2)*
7. C-Conflict → TA → Internalizing	.058*	.058	.060*	.060	.02(2)
8. C-Conflict → APIC→ TA → Internalizing	.024*	.024	.006	.006	5.75(3)
9. C-Positivity→ APIP → TA → Internalizing	.009	.009	−.015	−.015	11.13(3)*
10. C-Conflict → APIP → TA → Internalizing	−.004	−.004	.016	.016	6.80(3)
11. C-Positivity → APIC → TA → Internalizing	−.014*	−.014	−.001	−.001	5.00(3)

Note. Statistically significant values are in boldface type. C-Conflict/Positivity = couple conflict/positivity; APIC/P = adolescent perceived interparental conflict/positivity; TA = threat appraisals; Δχ² = increase from between-group constraints. Critical χ²(2) = 5.99, χ²(3) = 7.82.

^†p ≤ .10.

^*p < .05.