Table 6. Best models explaining time brown bears in Sweden spent active after being approached by humans.
| Model | AICC | ΔAICC | Wi(M) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 264.10 | 0.00 | 0.23 | |||
| 2 | Number of observers | 265.20 | 1.15 | 0.13 | |||
| 3 | Family status | 265.20 | 1.16 | 0.13 | |||
| 4 | Activity | 265.50 | 1.43 | 0.11 | |||
| 5 | Activity + family status | 265.50 | 1.46 | 0.11 | |||
| Wi(V): Activity (0.22), family status (0.24), number of observers (0.13) | |||||||
Resulting candidate models with ΔAICC < 2 after model dredging. We show AICC values, differences in AICC values (ΔAICC) and AICC weights for models (Wi(M)) and variables (Wi(V)). The “+” symbol indicates inclusion of a variable in the models without an interaction with other variables, whereas the “*” symbol indicates interactions between the variables included.