Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;10(4):e0122475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122475

Table 5. Regions with greater activation for the affect-poor than for the affect-rich choices.

Clusters with k < 65 voxels are not shown.

Cluster MNI Coordinates k Peak Significance Anatomical Region
X Y Z
1 50 –36 44 2164 4.84 Supramarginal gyrus, posterior division, supramarginal gyrus, anterior division
1 40 –48 52 4.83 Superior parietal lobule, angular gyrus
1 30 –66 30 3.53 Lateral occipital cortex, superior division
2 –46 –40 44 1577 4.75 Supramarginal gyrus, anterior division, supramarginal gyrus, posterior division, superior parietal lobule
2 –30 –60 44 4.24 Lateral occipital cortex, superior division, superior parietal lobule, angular gyrus
2 –28 –70 60 4.21 Lateral occipital cortex, superior division
3 44 –54 –10 361 5.01 Temporal occipital fusiform cortex, inferior temporal gyrus, temporo-occipital part,
3 36 –42 –22 3.04 Temporal occipital fusiform cortex, Temporal fusiform cortex, posterior division,
4 50 –74 –4 276 3.72 Lateral occipital cortex, inferior division
4 48 –80 10 2.95 Lateral occipital cortex, inferior division, lateral occipital cortex, superior division
4 32 –86 –2 2.65 Lateral occipital cortex, inferior division
5 –52 8 30 197 3.71 Precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis
6 48 4 20 191 4.45 Precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis
7 40 38 10 148 3.4 Frontal pole

Note. Results are based on the Harvard–Oxford cortical and subcortical structural atlases.