Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2014 Oct 27;278:417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.10.022

Table 1.

Mean (± SEM) goodness-of-fit of BERM parameters

PVAF ΔAICc*
FT 30-s

SHR 0,84 (0,03) 8997 (1308)
WISTAR 0,76 (0,08) 5644 (1709)
WKY 0,69 (0,09) 5988 (1364)

FT 90-s

SHR 0,93 (0,01) 17247 (2725)
WISTAR 0,84 (0,05) 5095 (1983)
WKY 0,63 (0,15) 4237 (1584)
*

Note. ΔAICc is the difference in likelihood of Equation 1 and a single-exponential model, after correcting for number of free parameters. Higher ΔAICc is indicative of a higher likelihood of Equation 1, given the data of each strain.