Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2014 Oct 22;87(4):719–727. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.343

Table 2.

Non-stenotic kidney hemodynamics and function in Sham, coronary artery stenosis (CAS), hypertension (HT) and CAS+HT pigs (mean±SEM, n=7 each).

Sham HT CAS CAS+HT P Value for Two-way ANOVA

HT CAS HT×CAS
Degree of renal artery stenosis, % 0 81.7±7.5*& 0 80.7±5.7*&
RBF, ml·min-1
Basal 469.0±63.1 779.4±81.1* 422.3±82.5# 428.5±51.0# 0.031 0.008 0.037
Ach 677.4±32.5 969.4±83.3* 590.6±111.0# 482.0±48.5*# 0.192 0.0003 0.007
Perfusion, ml·min-1·ml-1
Cortex: baseline 4.10±0.47 5.03±0.75 3.80±0.46# 4.03±0.30# 0.141 0.103 0.371
Ach 6.21±0.29 6.30±0.59 4.94±0.60*# 5.12±0.40*# 0.781 0.017 0.920
Medulla: baseline 2.84±0.44 2.19±0.10 1.98±0.35 2.00±0.35 0.370 0.146 0.342
Ach 3.77±0.55 3.47±0.43 3.82±0.47 2.48±0.39*& 0.095 0.328 0.281
RVR, mmHg·min-1·ml-1 0.18±0.02 0.16±0.02 0.27±0.04*# 0.29±0.04*# 0.511 0.012 0.174

RBF, renal blood flow; Ach, acetylcholine; ITC, intratubular concentration; RVR, renal vascular resistance.

*

P<0.05 vs. Sham;

#

P<0.05 vs. HT;

&

P<0.05 vs. CAS.

P<0.05 vs. baseline.