Table 3.
Diagnosis | Age | Sex | Site | Diagnosis X Site | Diagnosis X Sex | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F and p | Direction | F and p | Direction | F and p | Direction | F | F and p | Direction | F and p | Direction | |
DS-CPT | |||||||||||
In beta | F1,2089=128.60 p<.001 |
Decrease with age |
F4,2089=11.72 p<.001 |
F4,2089=2.64 p<.05 |
Site 3: Sz<HCS Sites 4&5: Sz>HCS |
||||||
Hit rate | F1,2089=81.00 p<.001 |
Sz<HCS | F1,2089=9.79 p<.005 |
Decrease with age |
F4,2089=4.90 p<.001 |
F4,2089=2.23 p<.07 |
F1,2089=5.02 p<.05 |
Sz: F<M HCS: F>M |
|||
False alarm rate |
F1,2089=45.82 p<.001 |
Sz>HCS | F1,2089=74.54 p<.001 |
Increase with age |
F4,2089=26.86 p<.001 |
||||||
RT hits (msec) |
F1,2089=161.74 p<.001 |
Sz>HCS | F1,2089=5.35 p<.05 |
F>M | F4,2089=3.17 p<.05 |
F4,2089=3.17 p<.05 |
Smaller at site 5 |
F1,2089=9.79 p<.005 |
Sz: F>M HCS: F=M |
||
CPT-IP: 3-digit |
|||||||||||
Hit rate | F1,2168=406.62 p<.001 |
Sz<HCS | F1,2168=26.53 p<.001 |
Decrease with age |
F4,2168=5.51 p<.001 |
F4,2168=2.77 p<.03 |
Smaller at site 5 |
||||
False alarm rate |
F1,2168=145.16 p<.001 |
Sz>HCS | F1,2168=7.02 p<.01 |
Increase with age |
F4,2168=9.59 p<.001 |
F4,2168=2.21 p<.07 |
Smaller at site 5 |
||||
RT hits (msec) |
F1,2167=210.02 p<.001 |
Sz>HCS | F1,2168=47.34 p<.001 |
Increase with age |
F1,2168=15.27 p<.001 |
F>M | F4,2168=5.69 p<.001 |
||||
CPT-IP: 4-digit |
|||||||||||
Hit rate | F1,2117=418.15 p<.001 |
Sz<HCS | F1,2117=15.01 p<.001 |
Decrease with age |
F1,2117=6.25 p<.02 |
F<M | |||||
False alarm rate |
F1,2117=91.59 p<.001 |
Sz>HCS | F1,2117=26.53 p<.001 |
Increase with age |
F4,2117=2.79 p<.03 |
||||||
RT hits (msec) |
F1,2114=142.93 p<.001 |
Sz>HCS | F1,2114=47.80 p<.001 |
Increase with age |
F1,2114=11.89 p<.001 |
F>M |
Note: CPT = Continuous Performance Test; DS-CPT = Degraded Stimulus CPT; CPT-IP = CPT, Identical Pairs; RT = response time