Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 2;47(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0114-8

Table 2.

Total number of SNPs with significant ( P< 10 −4 ) dominance effects, number of SNPs with positive (+ve) and negative (−ve) dominance effects in the discovery population, number of SNPs tested for validation of dominance effects (Nb tested), and percentage of SNPs with positive and negative dominance effects that had an effect in the same direction in the validation population for each trait

Trait 1 Total Nb FDR (%) +ve Nb -ve Nb Nb tested +ve validated 2 (%) -ve validated 2 (%)
PW_hip 191 36.3 174 17 185 66*** 56
X_hip 203 34.1 197 6 113 61* 25
HUMP 71 97.5 29 42 68 39 63
PW_lwt 207 33.4 197 10 205 74*** 70
X_lwt 265 26.1 253 12 265 60** 67
RFI 106 65.3 44 62 105 57 89***
PWIGF 183 37.8 99 84 108 64 33**
CP8 63 109.9 24 39 60 54 50
CRIB 75 92.3 32 43 72 48 71**
CIMF 197 35.1 71 126 194 69** 61*
CRBY 114 67 56 58 112 38 41
LLPF 102 67.9 66 36 101 47 43
SC12 186 37.2 26 160 70 30 42
PNS24 260 26.6 249 11 80 51* 18*
AGECL 136 59 20 116 82 40 55
PPAI 90 76.9 27 63 67 58* 36*

1Trait abbreviations are in Table 1; 2percentage of significant SNPs (%) that had an effect in the same direction in the validation population: * those that significantly differ from the expected number of SNPs at P < 0.05; **those that significantly differ from the expected number of SNPs at P < 0.01; and ***those that significantly differ from the expected number of SNPs at P < 0.001.