Table 3.
Safety–simplicity (SS) factors
Binary correlation between pen and conventional methods and SS factors | ||||||
SS factors | Pain perception | Bruises | Hypoglycemia | Ease of use | Reading the scale | |
Correlation | 54% | 30% | 0% | 55% | 35% | |
P-value | 0.001 | 0.073 | 1 | 0 | 0.038 | |
Logistic regression analysis for SS factors; G (−2 log likelihood): 21.510 | ||||||
SS factors | Pain perception | Bruises | Hypoglycemia | Ease of use | Reading the scale | Constant |
Coefficient | 3.98 | 2.14 | −2.20 | 5.32 | 0.97 | −5.67 |
Standard error | 1.58 | 1.39 | 1.73 | 2.23 | 1.42 | 2.27 |
P-value | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.01 |
Logistic regression analysis for SS factors; G (−2 log likelihood): 23.553 | ||||||
SS factors | Pain perception | Bruises | Ease of use | Constant | ||
Coefficient | 3.33 | 1.53 | 4.32 | −5.40 | ||
Standard error | 1.26 | 1.10 | 1.62 | 1.94 | ||
P-value | 0.008 | 0.164 | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Note: G: most used indicator in logistic regression to quantify the likelihood.