Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0121580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121580

Table 2. Two-way ANOVA results showing the effects of treatment (exposed or non-exposed), species and their interactions as well as the effect of treatment, wild/domesticated status and their interactions on the studied traits.

Trait Source F Source F
Plant height (28 dpi) Treatment 341.3*** Treatment 71.8***
Species 23.7*** Wild/domesticated 15.9***
Treatment x species 1.5 Treatment x wild/domesticated 0.0
Leaf chlorosis (28 dpi) Treatment 74.8*** Treatment 22.9***
Species 4.7*** Wild/domesticated 5.8*
Treatment x species 2.8*** Treatment x wild/domesticated 10.9**
Number of leaves (28 dpi) Treatment 92.1*** Treatment 29.4***
Species 9.5*** Wild/domesticated 13.8***
Treatment x species 2.9*** Treatment x wild/domesticated 6.1*
Number of tillers (28 dpi) Treatment 91.8*** Treatment 28.0***
Species 11.9*** Wild/domesticated 29.9***
Treatment x species 2.5** Treatment x wild/domesticated 6.5*
Number of leaves (112 dpi) a Treatment 63.0*** Treatment 13.1***
Species 20.0*** Wild/domesticated 28.5***
Treatment x species 4.7*** Treatment x wild/domesticated 3.3
Number of tillers (98 dpi) a Treatment 110.2*** Treatment 21.1***
Species 24.5*** Wild/domesticated 35.2***
Treatment x species 7.4*** Treatment x wild/domesticated 5.5*
Shoot dry weight (112 dpi) a Treatment 236.1*** Treatment 74.6***
Species 29.8*** Wild/domesticated 10.9**
Treatment x species 9.9*** Treatment x wild/domesticated 4.2*

aDead plants were not included in the analysis.

* = p<0.05,

** = p<0.01,

*** = p<0.001.