Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0116866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116866

Table 3. Comparison of 5 and 10 year outcomes for usual care vs. genomics-based care decisions using individual level probabilities.

Usual Care Treatment GC-Based Treatment P values
Mayo Clinic Cohort
5 year BCR free survival probability 0.632 (0.623, 0.642) 0.707 (0.698, 0.716) < 0.001
10 year BCR free survival probability 0.425 (0.416, 0.435) 0.496 (0.486, 0.505) < 0.001
5 year MET or Death probability 0.135 (0.128, 0.142) 0.129 (0.122, 0.135) 0.115
10 year MET or Death probability 0.324 (0.315, 0.333) 0.307 (0.298, 0.316) < 0.001
TJU Cohort
5 year BCR free survival probability 0.624 (0.615, 0.633) 0.705 (0.696, 0.714) < 0.001
10 year BCR free survival probability 0.415 (0.406, 0.425) 0.495 (0.485, 0.505) < 0.001
5 year MET or Death probability 0.110 (0.104, 0.117) 0.106 (0.100, 0.112) 0.007
10 year MET or Death probability 0.276 (0.267, 0.285) 0.261 (0.252, 0.269) < 0.001

Results are presented for the Mayo Clinic and TJU cohorts. McNemar’s test was used to test for significant differences between usual care and GC-based treatment outcomes for each cohort.

BCR = biochemical recurrence; MET = metastasis; GC = genomic classifier.