Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Jan 12;37:40–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002

Table 1.

Descriptive information, measures, and effect sizes of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author Sex Population
Characteristics
N and Sample Size
by Group
Measures & Description of Findings
Anderson (2002) M & F Married, Dating Cohabitating; Community N=7,395; Males: CMIPV (3,132); Females: CMIPV (3,726) CES-D; IPV significantly increases the odds of depression for males (OR=1.02, p=.001, d=.01) and females (OR=1.03, p=.001, d=.01).
Babcock et al. (2005) M Married, Dating Cohabitating; Community N=102; SNV (30), LMIPV (37), MSIPV (35) STAXI trait anger scales, SPAFF; IPV higher trait anger than SNV (d=.67, CI = .24 – 1.11). IPV higher observed contempt and belligerence than SNV (d=.58, CI = .14 – 1.01).
Barbour et al. (1998) M Married; Community N=88; SNV (34); DNV (23), CMIPV (31) STAXI, ATSS; CMIPV higher trait anger (d=.87, CI = .41 – 1.33), state anger (d=.52, CI = .08 – .97), and anger out scores (d=.97, CI = .51 – 1.43) than DNV and SNV. DNV and SNV had higher anger control than CMIPV (d= −.91, CI = −1.37 – −.45). No differences between groups on ATSS anger/rage (d=.01, CI = ns), annoyance (d= −.30, CI = ns), or negative emotions (d= −.33, ns).
Barnett, Fagan, & Booker (1991) M Married; Community, Probation N=228; SNV (50), DNV (43), CLIPV (93) – counseled/uncoun seled, GV (42) BDHI; CLIPV and GV higher overall BDHI scores than SNV and DNV (d=.34, CI = .07 – .60).
Beasley & Stoltenberg (1992) M Married, Cohabitating, Divorced, Separated; Clinical N=84; NV (35), CLIPV (49) STAS; IPV had higher scores than NV for state (d=.97, CI = .51 – 1.43) and trait (d=.59, CI = .15 – 1.04) anger.
Boyle & Vivian (1996) M Married; Clinical/ Community N=312; MSIPV (100), LMIPV (69), DNV (94), SNV (49) BDI, MAI-H, SS-Ang, STAS-T; IPV had higher scores than NV on anger on the STAS-T (d=.44, CI = .20 – .67) and spouse-specific anger (d=.50, CI = .26 – .73) and on depression (d=.69, CI = .46 – .92). IPV as not different from NV on hostility (d=.07, CI = ns) and MSIPV did not differ from LMIPV on any of these variables.
Burman, Margolin, & John (1993) M & F Married; Community N=65; Couples; SNV (15), MSIPV (17), VA (15), WI (18) SPAFF; No differences between groups on anger/contempt for husbands (d=.49, n.s.) or wives (d=.59, n.s.) or on non-hostile negative affect for husbands (d= − .26,n.s.) or wives (d= −.12, n.s.).
Cadsky & Crawford (1988) M Married and other not specified; Clinical N=172; MSIPV (66), LMIPV (106) BDHI; MSIPV scored higher than LMIPV on BDHI (d=.40, CI = .10 – .71). *Not enough info. provided to calculate effect size for depression.
Caetano & Cunradi (2003) M & F Married or Dating Co-habitating; Community N=1635; Couples CES-D; Female, but not male, IPV perpetrators had significantly greater odds of depression (d=1.91, CI = 1.80 – 2.02; d=.12, n.s.).
Chambers & Wilson (2007) M Married, Separated, Divorced, Single, Widowed; Clinical N=93; LMIPV (51), MSIPV (32), DB (10) PAI; DB cluster and MSIPV moderately distressed personality cluster had higher depression scores (d= 2.05; CI = 1.55 – 2.55;DEP scale) and higher anxiety scores than the LMIPV non-elevated personality cluster on the ANX and ARD scales, respectively (d=1.37, CI = .92–1.83 ; d= 1.71; CI = 1.23 – 2.18).
Clements & Holtzworth-Munroe (2009) M & F Married; Community N=66; Couples; SNV (14), DNV (14), IPV (38) Emotion Checklist; After conflict discussions with spouse there were no differences between IPV and NV for males and females, respectively on reported tense/anxious/fear-related (d= −.16, CI = n.s.; d= .30, CI = n.s.), anger/contempt/disgust (d= .02, CI = n.s.; d= −.12, CI = n.s.), or sad/discouraged (d= −1.14, CI = n.s.; d= .14, CI = n.s.) emotions.
Cogan & Fennell (2007) M & F Dating; Community N=396; Males: NV (44), MSIPV (9), VO (75), GV(65); Females: NV(64), MSIPV (26), VO (27), GV (86) CES-D, TAS; IPV groups reported greater depression than NV among males (d= .41, CI = .07 – .75), and females (d= .28, CI = .02–.56). Greater trait anger reported among IPV groups than NV for males (d=.84, CI = .47–1.21) but not females (d=.35, n.s.).
Costa & Babcock (2008) M Married or dating cohabitating “as if married”; Community N=178; SNV (21), DNV (27), MSIPV (130) ATSS; MSIPV articulated more anger than SNV and DNV across ATSS scenarios (d = .39, CI = .06 – .72), and reported more anger than SNV, specifically (d = .61, CI = .15 – 1.08).
Date & Ronan (2000) M Married, Dating non-cohabitating, other non-specified; Incarcerated N=59; NV (20), IPV (20), VO (20) TAS; Violent to non-partner only scored higher than NV (d=1.14, CI = .47 – 1.82).
Dewhurst, Moore, & Alfano (2008) M Relationship type not reported; Clinical, Incarcerated, CCG N=73; NV (22), IPV (22), GV (10), SO (19) BPI; Greater depression reported among IPV groups than NV (d=.80, CI = .29 – 1.32). No differences between groups on anxiety (d= .40, CI = n.s.).
Dutton & Browning (1988) M Married; CCG, Clinical N=60; NV (18) – some levels of IPV, VA (18), CLIPV (24) Using anger self ratings, CLIPV scored higher on anger during the abandonment scene than VA or NV (d=.68, CI = .15 – 1.21).
Dutton & Starzomski (1993) M Married*; Clinical, Incarcerated, CCG *Wife reports of IPV N=75; NV* (17), *IPV in control group, CLIPV(32), INCIPV (26) MAI; Across all groups, medium correlation between total anger and severe IPV (d=.49 C.I.= .04 −.95) and no correlation between total anger and CTS total (d=.14, CI = n.s.).
Dutton et al. (1994) M Married, Other relationships, unknown; Community, Clinical N=160; NV* (40) *IPV in control group, MSIPV (120) MAI; MSIPV higher anger than NV (d=.31, CI = .0004 – .62).
Dutton, Starzomski, & Ryan (1996) M Married; Clinical, CCG N=185; NV* (45) *IPV in control group, CLIPV (140) MAI; CLIPV reported more anger than NV (d=.41, CI = .07 – .75).
Dye & Eckhardt (2000) M & F Dating cohabitating and non-cohabitating; Clinical, CCG N=257; Males: SNV (71), MSIPV (24); Females: SNV (109), MSIPV (43) STAXI; For males, SNV reported greater anger control than MSIPV (d= −.49, CI = − .96 – −.02). For females, MSIPV had higher anger out (d=.51, CI = .15 – .87) and anger expression scores (d= .45, CI = .09 – .80).
Eckhardt & Kassinove (1998) M Married; Community/ Community mixed IPV group, CCG N=40; SNV (20), IPV (20) ATSS; SNV had more anger control strategies across ATSS scenarios than CLIPV (d= −.77, CI = −1.41 – −.13).
Eckhardt, Barbour, & Davidson (1998) M Married; Community N=88; SNV (34), DNV (23), IPV (31) ATSS; IPV articulated more hostile attribution biases than DNV (d=.84, CI = .28 – 1.40) and SNV (d=1.04, CI = .52 – 1.56). During anger scenario, SNV scored higher on anger control statements than IPV (d= −.98, CI = −1.49 – −.46), and there were no differences between IPV and DNV (d= −.19, CI = ns).
Eckhardt (2007) M Married; Community N=102; NV (56), IPV (46) STAXI-2; IPV higher scores than NV on trait anger (d=.80, CI = .39 – 1.20) and anger out (d=.74, CI = .34 – 1.14). NV scored higher than IPV on anger control/out (d= −.53, CI = −.93 – −.13) and anger control/in (d= −.49, CI = −.89 – − .09). No difference between groups on anger in (d= .31, ns).
Eckhardt et al., (2008) M Married, Dating cohabitating, Single, Separated, Divorced; Clinical N=199; LMIPV: FO (61); MSIPV (138) comprised of: LLA (86), DB (40), GV (12) HAT, TAS; MSIPV scored higher on trait anger than LMIPV (d=1.11, CI = .79 – 1.44). MSIPV also scored higher than LMIPV on the HAT (d=.63, CI = .32 − .94).
Eckhardt, Jamison, & Watts (2002) M Dating non-cohabitating; Community N=33; NV (16), LMIPV (17) STAXI, ATSS; LMIPV higher overall score on STAXI trait anger (d=1.73 CI = .93 – 2.53), anger in (d=.78, CI = .07 – 1.48), anger out (d=2.12, CI = 1.26 – 2.97) than NV except for anger control (d= −1.80, CI = −2.61 – −.99). No difference between groups on ATSS anger expression variables (d= −.09, CI = ns), or other negative emotions (d= −.43, ns).
Else et al. (1993) M Married, Divorced, Separated, Never Married; Clinical, CCG N=42; NV (21), CLIPV (21) HDHQ, MMPI, BDI; No difference between CLIPV and NV on hostility (d=.45, CI = ns). CLIPV did not differ from NV on reported depression across two measures (d=.19, CI = ns).
Feldbau-Kohn, Heyman, & O’Leary (1998) M Married; Clinical N=89; MSIPV State-Trait Anger Scale, BDI; Medium sized correlations between IPV and state-trait anger (d= .58, CI = .16 – 1.01) and IPV and depression (d=.43, CI = .01 – .85).
Follingstad et al. (1992) M Dating cohabitating or non-cohabitating, Married; Community N=74; LMIPV (37) – termed “non-abusive” but IPV reported, MSIPV (37) BDHI; MSIPV had higher BHDI assault scores than LMIPV (d=.63, CI = .17 – 1.10). No differences between groups on BDHI verbal (d= −.14, CI = ns) or irritable scores (d= −.12, CI = ns).
Gavazzi, Julian, & McKenry (1996) M Married, Dating cohabitating; Clinical/ Community mixed, CCG N=152; NV (100), IPV (52) BSI; IPV had higher scores than NV on depression (d=.46, CI = .12 – .80), anxiety (d=.45, CI = .12 – .79), and hostility (d=.67, CI = .33 – 1.02).
Gordis, Margolin, & Vickerman (2005) M Married; Community N=90; NV (38), IPV over 1 year ago (23), recent IPV (29) Marital Coding System (observational); Greater hostility observed for IPV groups compared to NV (d=.60, CI = .18 – 1.03). IPV within past year reported greater hostility than IPV perpetrated over 1 year ago (d=1.07, CI = .49 – 1.66) and NV (d=1.17, CI = .65–1.70).
Graham et al. (2012) M & F Rel. type not reported; Community N=577; Males: BDIPV (128), LMIPV (56); Females BDIPV (157); LMIPV (236) Composite International Diagnostic Interview; Odds ratios between IPV and depression for males (d=.29, OR = 3.37, p = .001) and females (d = .35, OR = 4.35, p = .001).
Greene, Coles, & Johnson (1994) M Dating Cohabitating, Married, Divorced, Single; Clinical N=40; 4 IPV groups based on personality clusters; Histrionic (9), Depressed (11), Normal (11), Disturbed (9) Histrionic and Depressed IPV clusters had lower STAXI anger expression scores than Normal and Disturbed IPV clusters (d= 1.38, CI = .69 – 2.06). Histrionic cluster had highest Hysteria scale score (d=.77, CI = .01 – 1.53), Normal cluster had the lowest (d=.69, CI = .004 – 1.37). No difference between Normal and all other clusters on depression (d=.55, CI = ns).
Hamberger et al. (1996) M Married; Clinical N=833; MSIPV (148), LLA (212), LMIPV (335) NAS; BDI; Non-pathological MSIPV and LLA clusters scored higher on the NAS than the LMIPV passive-aggressive dependent cluster (d=.64; CI=.49 – .79). MSIPV higher depression scores than LLA and LMIPV (d=.90; CI=.72–1.09)
Hastings & Hamberger (1988) M Married, Single, Divorced, Separated; Clinical, CCG N=168; DNV (43), IPV alcohol problems (47), IPV no-alcohol problems (78) NAS, MCMI, BDI; DNV had higher anger scores than both IPV groups (d= − .48, CI = −.88 – −.08). IPV with and without alcohol problems reported more depression than DNV, respectively (d=.85, CI = .42 – 1.28; d=.66, CI = .28 – 1.04) on the BDI. IPV reported more depression (d=.76, CI = .41 – 1.12) and anxiety (d=.68, CI = .33 – 1.04) than DNV on MCMI.
Hershorn & Rosenbaum (1991) M Dating cohabitating and non-cohabitating, Married, Separated, Single; Clinical N=41; MSIPV (17 overcontrolled /24 undercontrolled) BDHI; Overcontrolled hostile more severe IPV (d=.87, CI = .22 – 1.52), but less frequent IPV (d=.73, CI = .09 – 1.37) than undercontrolled hostile.
Holtzworth-Munroe et al. (2000) M Married; Community N=164; SNV (39), DNV (23), FO (37), DB (15), LLA (34), MSIPV (16) SPAFF; IPV groups rated higher on anger/hostility composite than SNV and DNV (d=.66; CI = .34–.98). SNV group had the lowest score on anger/hostility (d=.79, CI = .42–1.16). No differences between groups on rated sadness (d= −.06, n.s.).
Holtzworth-Munroe & Smutzler (1996) M Married; Community/ Clinical mixed IPV sample; CCG N=97; SNV (28), DNV (23), CLIPV (25), CMIPV (21) Biglan rating system; There were no significant difference between IPV and NV groups on anger (d=.21, CI = ns) or hostility (d=.30, CI = ns) in response to written and videotaped stimuli.
Jacobson et al. (1994) M Married; Community/C linical mixed sample N=92; DNV (32), MSIPV (60) SPAFF; MSIPV scored higher on SPAFF anger/contempt composite (d=.48, CI = .03−.93), and belligerence (d=.50, CI = .07 – .93) than DNV. There were no differences between groups on sadness (d= – .04, n.s.) or tension/fear (d=.17, n.s.).
Julian & McKenry (1993) M Married, Separated, Divorced, Single; Community/ Clinical mixed sample N=94; NV (50), IPV (42) CES-D; NV scored higher on depression than IPV (d= −.55, CI = −.94 – −.13).
Kendra, Bell, & Guimond (2012) F Dating cohabitating & non-cohabitating; Community N=496; LMIPV MAI; Medium sized correlation between anger arousal and IPV (d=.47, CI = .29 – .65)
Kim & Capaldi (2004) M & F Dating cohabitating/ non-cohabitating, Married; Community N=158; Couples; IPV Wave 2 (158), IPV Wave 3 (148) *Waves were 3 years apart, same sample with attrition CES-D; Depression and IPV are correlated at wave 2 for females (d=.77, CI = .45–1.10) but not males (d=.16, n.s.). Wave 2 depression is correlated with wave 3 IPV for females (d=.70, CI = .37– 1.03) and males (d=.47, CI = .15 – .80).
Leonard & Senchak (1993) M Married; Community N=607; IPV STAXI Trait Anger, BDHI, and permissiveness for aggression composite; Moderate correlation between anger/hostility composite and IPV (d =.61, CI= .44 −.77).
Maiuro, Cahn, & Vitaliano (1986) M Married, Dating Cohabitating; N=107, NV (29), IPV (78) BDHI; IPV had higher BDHI scores than NV (d = .86, CI = .42 – 1.30).
Maiuro, Vitaliano, & Cahn (1987) M Never married, Separated/ Divorced, Married; Clinical, CCG N=119, NV (26), LMIPV (30), VO (26), MSIPV (37) BAAQ; IPV scored higher than NV (d=1.38, CI = .91 – 1.85). No difference between LMIPV and MSIPV on BAAQ (d= −.08, CI = ns).
Maiuro et al. (1988) M Cohabitating/ never married, Separated/ divorced, Married; Clinical, CCG N=129; NV (29), LMIPV (39), VO (29), MSIPV (38) BDHI, HDHQ, BDI; IPV scored higher on BDHI (d=.85, CI = .42 – 1.27) and HDHQ (d=.86, CI= .44 – 1.29) than NV. LMIPV scored higher than NV, VO, and MSIPV on depression (d = −1.26, CI = − 1.63 – −.88).
Margolin (1988) M & F Married; Community N=45; Couples; IPV (25) – PA and VA; NV (20) – includes WI type with some IPV NAI, MMPI; No differences between IPV and NV for husbands and wives, respectively, on anger (d=.55, CI = ns; d= −.02, CI = ns), depression (d=.59, CI = ns; d=.29, CI = ns), or hysteria (d=.42, CI = ns; d=.16, CI = ns).
Margolin, John, & Foo (1998) M Married; Community N=171; NV (140): Emot. Abusive (69), Non Abusive (71); IPV (31): Phys. & Emot. Abusive BDHI; IPV Phys. and Emot. Abusive scored higher than both NV groups (d= .46, CI = .07 – .85). Emot. Abusive NV scored higher on BDHI than Non Abusive (d=.40, CI = .07 – .74).
Margolin, John, & Gleberman (1988) M & F Married; Community N=78; SNV (19), IPV groups: IPV (19), VA (18), WI (22) Self-reported affective state after conflict discussion with spouse; IPV groups scored higher than NV for husbands and wives, respectively, on anger (d=1.16, CI = .60 – 1.72; d=1.35, CI = .78 – 1.92), anxiety (d=.93, CI = .39 – 1.48; d= 1.08, CI = .53 – 1.63), and sadness (d=.94, CI = .39 – 1.49; d=.85, CI = .30 – 1.39).
McNulty & Hellmuth (2008) M & F Married; Community N=123; Males: LMIPV (61); Females MSIPV (62) PANAS; IPV was not significantly correlated with negative affect for husbands (d=.12, CI = n.s.) or wives (d=.39, CI = ns).
Murphy, Taft, & Eckhardt (2007) M Dating cohabitating and non-cohabitating, Separated; Clinical N=139; IPV: Pathological Anger (26), Low Anger Control (40), Normal Anger (70) Pathological anger group reported more IPV than low anger control and normal anger groups at pre tx (d=.79, CI = .35 – 1.22), post tx (d=.59, CI = .15 −1.02), and at 6 month follow up (d=.61, CI = .18 – 1.04).
Pan, Neidig, & O’Leary (1994) M Married and other non-specified; Army population N=11,870; LMIPV Modified BDI, 15 items; Odds ratios between depression and mild (d= 1.04) and severe IPV (d= .86).
Saunders (1992) M Married; Clinical N=165; LMIPV (86), MSIPV: GV (48), EV (31) NAS, BDI; MSIPV higher in anger (d= .69, CI = .37 – 1.00) and depression (d = .79, CI = .47 – 1.11) than LMIPV.
Schumacher et al. (2008) M & F Married; Community N=634; Couples; 4 Longitudinal Waves 10 item hostility measure; Medium correlations between hostility and IPV averaged across time of marriage and 1, 2, and 4 year anniversaries for males (d=.54, CI = .38 – .70) and females (d=.57, CI = .41 – .73).
Shorey et al. (2010) F Married, Dating Cohabitating; Clinical N=80; MSIPV STAXI Trait Anger Scales; Large sized correlation between physical IPV and trait anger (d=1.07, CI = .60–1.53).
Shorey et al. (2012) M Married, Dating cohabitating and non-cohabitating, single, divorced, separated; Clinical N=308; CLIPV PDSQ; Small to medium correlations for IPV and depression (d=.41, CI= .18 – .63), PTSD (d=.54, CI = .31−.77), GAD and social phobia (d=.54, CI = .31−.77, respectively), and panic disorder (d=.39, CI = .16 – .61).
Sullivan et al. (2013) F Relationship type not reported; Community N=369; CMIPV CES-D; STAI: State-Anxiety subscale; Small correlation between IPV and depression (d=.24, CI = .04 – .44). No correlation between IPV and anxiety (d= − .04, ns).
Swan et al. (2005) F Relationship type not reported; Community/ Clinical mixed sample N=108; IPV CES-D, Anger Expression Scale; Medium sized correlations between IPV and anger in (d=.63, CI = .24–1.02) and anger control (d= −.49, CI = −.88 – −.11). Large sized correlations between IPV and depression (d=.70, CI = .31–1.09) and IPV anger out (d=.98, CI = .58–1.38).
Swan & Snow (2003) F Relationship type not reported; Clinical N=95; IPV groups varied on coercion by male or female and female as sole aggressor; VNV (32) Anger Expression Scale, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, CES-D; VNV, interestingly, scored higher on anger in than IPV groups (d=−.44, CI = −.87 – −.01). No differences between groups on anger out (d=.20, n.s.) or anger control (d=.29, n.s.). VNV reported greater anxiety (d= − .73, CI = −1.17 – −.30) and depression (d= − 1.26, CI = −1.72 – −.80) than IPV groups.
Tharp et al. (2012) M Dating Cohabitating/ Married/other; Community N=121; LMIPV BDHI; Large sized correlation between IPV and hostility (d=.93, CI = .55 – 1.30).
Tweed & Dutton (1998) M Rel. type not reported; Clinical N=114; NV (44), LMIPV (70) – 2 groups based on personality types MCMI-II, MAI; LMIPV greater anger than NV (d= .47, CI = .09 – .85). Impulsive LMIPV reported greater anger than NV (d = .63, CI = .18 – 1.07). Impulsive LMIPV had greater depression (d = −1.37, CI = −1.89 – −.85) and anxiety (d = −1.31, CI = −1.83 – −.79) scores than Instrumental LMIPV.
Waltz, Babcock, & Gottman (2000) M Married; Community N=103; DNV (32), GV (17), Pathological (16), Family Only (38) SPAFF; No difference between IPV groups and DNV on SPAFF anger (d=.21, CI = n.s.), tension/fear (d=.13, CI = n.s.), or sadness (d=.28, CI = n.s.). IPV groups scored higher on SPAFF contempt than DNV (d=.46, CI = .03−.88).
a

Sex = sex of IPV perpetrator; Construct = Anger (A), Hostility ( H), and Negative Emotion (NE); ( ) = N for each subgroup; CI = 95% confidence interval; IPV = intimate partner violence (severity unspecified); LMIPV = low/moderate IPV; MSIPV = moderate/severe IPV; NV = non-violent; DNV = distressed/dissatisfied non-violent; SNV = satisfied non-violent; VO = violent outside intimate relationship; GV = generally violent within and outside of intimate relationship; SO = sex offenders; DB = dysphoric/borderline; EV= emotionally volatile; FO = family only; LLA = low-level antisocial; VNV = nonviolent victim of IPV; VA = verbally abusive; WI = nonviolent withdrawing; CLIPV = clinical IPV; CMIPV = community IPV; BDIPV = bidirectional IPV; INCIPV = incarcerated IPV.