Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 3;14(4):385–395. doi: 10.1128/EC.00273-14

TABLE 1.

Identification of putative PUF elements in UTRs of known HAC1/HXL1 orthologs in fungia

Species Strain Locus identifier Sequence
Annotated UTR
5′ UTR 3′ UTR
Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii H99 CNAG_06134 UGUAACAGUA UGUACCGAUA Y
Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans Jec21 CNM01380 UGUAACAUUA UGUAUCGAUA N
Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans B-3501A CNBM1240 UGUAACAUUA UGUAUCGAUA N
Cryptococcus gattii R265 CNBG_4842.2 UGUAACAUUA Y
Cryptococcus gattii WM276 CGB_M1590W N
Coprinopsis cinerea Okayama7#130 CC1G_02249 UGUAGCAGUA N
Ustilago maydis 521 UM03509.1 UGUAAAUGUA N
Yarrowia lipolytica CLIB122 XP_500811 N
Candida albicans WO-1 CAWG_00794.1 N
Candida albicans SC5314 C1_06130C N
Aspergillus fumigatus H237 ACJ61678 Y
Aspergillus nidulans FGSC 26 Q8TFU8 Y
a

We screened the previously identified HAC1 orthologs (2) for putative PUF elements that match the PUF element in C. neoformans var. grubii HXL1. The putative PUF elements in the HXL1 homolog for each species are listed. Included in the table are both sequences with annotated UTRs (yes [Y]) and sequences without annotated UTRs (no [N]). For genes without annotated UTRs, sequences 500 bp upstream and downstream from the coding sequence were scanned for putative PUF elements. For putative PUF elements with variable regions that do not match the known Puf5p consensus sequence, the nonmatching nucleotide is shown in bold and underlined (18).