Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Mar;35(3):359–367.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.003

Table 3. Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Reporting According to Country of Journal Origin.

US (n = 63) Europe (n = 96) Asia (n = 12) Other (n = 4) P value
Overall Outcomes 0.071δ
 Positive 40 (63%) 45 (47%) 4 (33%) 3 (75%)
 Neutral/Negative 23 (37%) 51 (53%) 8 (67%) 1 (25%)
Mean Number of Wrists per Study 20.7 19.4 20.4 14.8 0.939ε
Complication Rate α 12.3% 24.3% 7.6% 0.1% 0.067ε
Mean Follow-Up β 73 72 55 66 0.894ε
Statistical Analysis Present 29 (46%) 20 (21%) 3 (25%) 0 (0%) 0.004δ
Time to Publication (years) γ 5.8 4.5 5.4 NA 0.267ε
Length of Patient Enrollment (years) π 11.6 8.1 12.3 NA 0.093ε

Data reported as number of abstracts (% of total abstracts for given geographic region)

Only includes wrists corresponding to Kienbock's patients

α

Data presented as the average complication rate for studies with available data; Reported in 42 of 63 US studies (67%), 42 of 96 European studies (44%), 3 of 12 Asian studies (25%), and 2 of 4 studies published in another country (50%)

β

Data reported in 59 of 63 US studies (94%), 68 of 96 European studies (71%), 9 of 12 Asian studies (75%), and 4 of 4 studies published in another country (100%)

γ

Data presented as time from end of patient enrollment to publication; Reported in 38 of 63 US studies (60%), 42 of 96 European studies (44%), 7 of 12 Asian studies (58%), and 0 of 4 studies published in another country (0%)

π

Data reported in 38 of 63 US studies (60%), 42 of 96 European studies (44%), 7 of 12 Asian studies (58%), and 0 of 4 studies published in another country (0%)

δ

Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test

ε

Statistical analysis using ANOVA