Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jan;15(1):42–54. doi: 10.1038/nrc3858

Table 2.

Mouse models of bladder cancer

Type of model Description Advantages Disadvantages
Non-autochthonous models
Orthotopic engraftment models Primary urothelial or bladder cancer cells implanted into the bladder wall of recipient hosts such that tumors arise in the bladder
  • Ease of functional analyses of candidate genes

  • Preclinical models for either intravesical or systemic therapy

  • Engrafted tumors do not develop de novo

  • Tumors arise in immunodeficient mice and therefore may not inform on the role of the immune system

Renal grafting models Urothelial or bladder cells are combined with embryonic bladder mesenchyme and grown under the kidney capsule of recipient hosts
  • Ease of functional analyses of candidate genes

  • Investigate epithelial-mesenchymal tissue interactions

  • Preclinical models for systemic therapy

Patient derived Xenografts (PDX) Engraftment of patient tumors into recipient mice
  • Potential to model individual patient tumors

  • Potential to model specific bladder cancer subtypes

  • Preclinical analysis of agents for specific patient tumors

  • Tumors arise in immunodeficient mice

  • Take-rate may differ depending on the tumor phenotype or sub-type

  • No definitive evidence that responses in the PDX models will translate to patients

Autochthonous Carcinogen-based models
Carcinogen-based Treatment of mice with carcinogens in the drinking water, the most common is BBN
  • Mimic environmental exposures associated with human bladder cancer

  • Not limited to mice; work in various species

  • Can be combined with GEM models to exacerbate their bladder cancer phenotypes

  • Heterogeneity of cancer phenotypes makes it difficult to use for molecular investigations or preclinical studies

  • Metastases are rare

Autochthonous GEM models
Transgenic models Expression of oncogenes in the urothelium (such as expression of SV40 Large T antigen)
  • Original in vivo models of bladder cancer

  • Limited options to express genes specifically in the bladder

  • Phenotypes of single alleles, and even most compound alleles, are relatively modest

  • Few models develop invasive bladder cancer

  • Rare occurrence of metastases

Germline models Loss of function of tumor suppressor genes in the germline (such as p53 null mice)
  • Phenotypes can be enhanced using BBN

Conditional alleles Conditional or inducible gene recombination of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes in the urothelium (such as deletion of Pten and p53)
  • Range of bladder tumor phenotypes