Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Mar 4;111:300–311. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.050

Table 2.

Results of the testing of two predictive models for regional heritability values.

Model 1 (h2=FA + d) HCP Meta-SE Mega
βFA ± sd (t-value, P-value) 0.40±0.004 (90.3, p<10−16) 0.35±0.004 (91.2, p<10−16) 0.42±0.002 (169.7, p<10−16)
βd ± sd (t-value, P-value) −.004±4.3·10−5 (101.4, p<10−16) −0.031±3.8·10−5 (80.9, p<10−16) −0.026±2.4·10−5 (106.6, p<10−16)
R2 (t-value, P-value) 0.25 (p<10−16) 0.32 (p<10−16) 0.41 (p<10−16)
Model 2 (h2=FA + d+FA·d) HCP Meta-SE Mega
βFA ± sd (t-value, P-value) 0.39±0.001 (32.9, p<10−16) 0.03±0.01 (2.8, p=0.004) 0.26±0.01 (35.5, p<10−16)
βd ± sd (t-value, P-value) −0.004±0.0001 (65.3, p<10−16) −0.007±0.0001 (67.3, p<10−16) −0.004±0.0001 (65.3, p<10−16)
βFA*d ± sd (t-value, P-value) −0.0008±0.002 ( 0.3, 0.75) 0.009±0.0002 (40.9, p<10−16) 0.004±0.0001 (28.4, p<10−16)
R2 (t-value, P-value) 0.25 (p<10−16) 0.33 (p<10−16) 0.42 (p<10−16)