Skip to main content
letter
. 2015 Mar;7(3):532–542. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.45

Table 3. Summary of the most representative reports about HeartWare utilization in the setting of the BTT strategy.

Author (Ref.), study period Patients (n.) Mean support time (days) Competing outcomesa Survival
Wieselthaler (24), 03/2006-11/2007 23 305 HTx 21%, ongoing 60%, recovery 4%, death 13% 6-month 91%, 12-month 86%
Strueber (20), 03/2006-12/2008 50 348 HTx 40%, ongoing 34%, recovery 8%, death 18% 6-month 90%, 12-month 84%, 24-month 79%
Aaronson (21), 08/2008-08/2010 140 249b HTx 28%, ongoing 62%, recovery 0%, death 4% 6-month 94%, 12-month 86%
Slaughter (22), 08/2008-12/2011 332 275b HTx + recovery 21%, ongoing 67%, death 6% 6-month 91%, 12-month 84%
Strueber (23), 02/2009-11/2012 254 363 HTx 22%, ongoing 59%, recovery 1%, death 16% 6-month 87%, 12-month 85%, 24-month 79%

a, competing outcomes analysis must be reported to different follow-up periods (FUP): 12-month FUP (24), 12-month FUP (20), 6-month FUP (21), 6-month FUP (22); b, median support time; c, survival data are referred to as estimate of success (defined as survival to HTx, successful recovery with device explant or remaining on continued HeartWare support). BTT, bridge-to-transplantation; HTx, heart transplantation; NR, not reported.