Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 9;110(1):148–158. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.362

Table 3.

Proportions and predictors of participation in screening.

Variable Proportion of participants OR for participation (95%CI)a P valuea
Age b 1.09 (0.90,1.31) 0.39
Sex
Male 45.4% 1.0 (ref)
Female 44.0% 0.94 (0.65,1.36) 0.75
Education
Less than high school 33.3% 0.60 (0.17,2.06) 0.41
High school or some college 48.0% 1.17 (0.80,1.71) 0.42
College/professional training 44.0% 1.0 (ref)
Employment
Employed 40.7% 1.0 (ref)
Unemployed/homemaker 63.0% 2.48 (1.07,5.77) 0.03
Retired 47.6% 1.34 (0.90,2.00) 0.15
Marital status
Married 45.6% 1.23 (0.79,1.90) 0.36
Not married (single, widowed, divorced, separated) 40.7% 1.0 (ref)
Reflux symptoms
Heartburn or acid regurgitation >= 1 / week 67.4% 2.94 (1.47,5.88) 0.002
Heartburn or acid regurgitation < 1 / week 43.6% 1.10 (0.75,1.63) 0.62
None 41.1% 1.0 (ref)
Current use PPI drugs
PPI user 46.0% 1.02 (0.62,1.68) 0.93
PPI non-user 45.4% 1.0 (ref)
Randomization group
muTNE 48.1% 1.32 (0.84,2.07) 0.23
huTNE 47.7% 1.23 (0.78,1.94) 0.38
sEGD 40.7% 1.0 (ref)
SSC score c 1.01 (0.73,1.41) 0.93
Charlson comorbidity index d 0.99 (0.89,1.12) 0.94
a

multiple variable model.

b

per 10 years of age.

c

per unit score.

d

per unit of the index.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PPI, proton pump inhibitors; SSC, somatic symptom checklist; sEGD, sedated endoscopy; muTNE, mobile unitTNE; huTNE, hospital unitTNE