Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 9;110(1):148–158. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.362

Table 5.

The rates of detection of manifestations of GERD-induced esophageal injury in subjects with and without reflux symptoms.

Findings Frequent reflux ≥1/week (n=29) Infrequent reflux <1/week (n=86) No reflux (n=90) P value§
Normal GE junction 13 (44.8%) 44 (51.2%) 59 (65.6%) 0.06
Hiatus hernia present 22 (75.9%) 43 (50.0%) 58 (64.4%) 0.03
Mean (SD) Hiatus hernia length (cm) 2.4 (1.7) 1.4 (1.6) 1.9 (2.1) 0.03
Suspected BE on endoscopy 7 (24.1%) 17 (19.8%) 14 (15.6%) 0.53
Confirmed BE on histology 6 (20.7%) 6 (7.0%) 4 (4.4%) 0.03
Erosive Esophagitis 11 (37.9%)* 29 (33.7%) ** 21 (23.3%) *** 0.18

Data presented as number of patients (percentage) or mean (+/−SD, standard deviation).

§

Fisher's Exact test (discrete variables) or Kruskal-Wallis test (quantitative variables).

*

11 patients [Grade A= 5, Grade B= 4, Grade C=2].

**

29 patients [Grade A=15, Grade B=13, Grade C=1].

***

21 patients [Grade A=12, Grade B=8, Grade C=1].