Table 3.
Log binomial regression models for the effect of blood lead concentration (B-Pb) on reading failure and math failure
| All children (n = 46,796) | NH white children (n = 4,064) | NH black children (n = 29,736) | Hispanic children (n = 12,996) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | |
| Reading failure | |||||||||
| Unadjusted B-Pb (μg/dL) | 1 μg/dL increase | 1.12 | 1.11, 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.11, 1.23 | 1.08 | 1.07, 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.06, 1.12 |
| 5 μg/dL increase | 1.74 | 1.66, 1.83 | 2.19 | 1.67, 2.87 | 1.45 | 1.37, 1.53 | 1.54 | 1.36, 1.75 | |
| Adjusted a,b B-Pb (μg/dL) | 1 μg/dL increase | 1.06 | 1.05, 1.07 | 1.14 | 1.08, 1.20 | 1.05 | 1.04, 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.05, 1.11 |
| 5 μg/dL increase | 1.32 | 1.26, 1.39 | 1.93 | 1.47, 2.54 | 1.28 | 1.21, 1.35 | 1.47 | 1.29, 1.66 | |
| Math failure | |||||||||
| Unadjusted B-Pb (μg/dL) | 1 μg/dL increase | 1.13 | 1.12, 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.09, 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.07, 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.06, 1.13 |
| 5 μg/dL increase | 1.84 | 1.76, 1.93 | 2.03 | 1.51, 2.73 | 1.47 | 1.39, 1.55 | 1.58 | 1.37, 1.82 | |
| Adjusted B-Pb (μg/dL) | 1 μg/dL increase | 1.06 | 1.05, 1.07 | 1.11 | 1.05, 1.18 | 1.05 | 1.04, 1.06 | 1.09 | 1.06, 1.12 |
| 5 μg/dL increase | 1.32 | 1.26, 1.39 | 1.71 | 1.26, 2.30 | 1.28 | 1.22, 1.35 | 1.51 | 1.31, 1.75 | |
Model Summaries are for Children with B-Pbs Lower than 10 μg/dL, Overall and Stratified by Race/Ethnicity.
aFor All Races, model includes blood lead concentration (<10 μg/dL), gender, mother’s education, low-income, very low birth weight/preterm, child’s age at time of B-Pb, ISAT vs. Iowa, and race (black vs. white and Hispanic vs. white).
bFor individual races, model includes blood lead concentration, gender, mother’s education, low-income, very low birth weight/preterm, child’s age at time of B-Pb, ISAT vs Iowa.