Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;147(4):1168–1178. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1567

TABLE 5 ] .

Potential Data Sources for Value Metrics

Data Source Benefits Limitations Typical Use (Example)
Administrative Commonly available across institutions for large groups of patients
No new data collection required
Delay in coding (not real time)
Limited granularity
Potential for coding errors
Structure (staffing ratio12)
Process (RBC transfusion58)
Outcome (length of stay)
Cost (cost/d4)
Manual chart abstraction Good detail on focused areas
Can translate free text from chart into more-structured data
Resource intensive per chart reviewed
Limited scalability
Depends on clinician documentation
Process (antibiotic administration for sepsis52)
Outcome (length of stay)
EMR extraction Larger population
More discrete clinical data
Potential to automate measurement, reducing ongoing resource utilization (more efficient in the long run)
Potential real-time assessment
Depends on clinician documentation
Initial development cost
Advance system planning required (eg, variables, data repositories)
Balance between discrete data and narrative
Process (antibiotic administration for sepsis52)
Outcome (length of stay)
Survey Provides data commonly not present in the medical record
May be scaled depending on scope of project
Respondent burden
Limited ability to integrate into other data reporting
Structure (staffing ratio12)
Outcome (patient satisfaction71)
Ancillary system (eg, infection surveillance and adverse event reporting systems) Provide information commonly not present in medical records Challenging to integrate with other systems for data gathering and reporting purposes
Initial cost to develop system
Outcome (CLABSI36)
Outcome (unplanned extubation35)

EMR = electronic medical record. See Table 1 legend for expansion of other abbreviation.