Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0122933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122933

Table 1. Characterization of the heat tolerance of AtHSP101 plus and AtHSP101 minus cotton plants from different cell lines.

Treatment Cell Line Transgenic Plant Number Bolls/Plant Seeds/Plant Seeds/Boll
43°C/28°C day/night 1–4 (pos.) 1 50 482 9.64
1–4 (pos.) 2 51 418 8.20
1–8 (pos.) 3 27 286 10.59
1–8 (pos.) 22 29 251 8.66
1–8 (pos.) 24 43 283 6.58
21–2 (pos.) 5 18 142 7.89
Average 36 310 8.59
21–2 (neg.) 4 17 60 3.53
C312-5A (neg.) 8 13 191 14.69
6–9 (neg.) 10 10 110 11.00
C312-5A (neg.) 18 23 220 9.57
Average 12 240 9.70
31°C /27°C day/night 1–4 (pos.) 51 12 240 20
1–4 (pos.) 50 18 424 23.56
1–4 (pos.) 48 15 362 24.13
1–8 (pos.) 40 22 631 28.68
21–2 (pos.) 34 18 513 28.5
21–2 (pos.) 35 31 703 22.68
Average 19 479 25.2
1–8 (neg.) 39 24 710 29.58
1–8 (neg.) 52 14 352 25.14
2–6 (neg.) 31 32 756 23.63
Average 23 606 26.35

Values in boldface within a treatment are significant at a = 0.05 comparing AtHSP101 positive and AtHSP101 negative plants. Values underlined are significant at a = 0.05 comparing AtHSP101 positive and AtHSP101 negative plants between treatments.

Plants were grown in either a greenhouse with control (31°C /27°C day/night) or heat-treated (43°C/28°C day/night) environments.