Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0123012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123012

Table 2. Mean change in domain scores for FACQ-PC, SF-12v2, and ADL/IADL from baseline to follow-up.

Time Intervention (n = 233) Control (n = 89) Adjusted p-value 1 Effect size 2 (95%CI)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
FACQ-PC 3 Caregiver Strain 1 2.92 (0.87) 2.92 (0.87) 0.018* 0.348 (0.25–0.41)
2 2.84 (0.72) 3.01 (0.82)
Caregiver Distress 1 3.13 (0.76) 3.20 (0.88) 0.261 0.231 (0.11–0.30)
2 3.03 (0.70) 3.24 (0.84)
SF-12v2 4 MCS 1 43.13 (10.59) 44.90 (12.56) 0.678 0.156 (-1.70–1.40)
2 44.48 (10.51) 44.85 (11.53)
PCS 1 51.93 (9.65) 50.53 (11.78) 0.975 0.000 (-1.36–0.87)
2 51.29 (9.97) 48.94 (11.12)
Assistance with ADL’s 3 ADL 1 1.72 (0.76) 1.71 (0.80) 0.090 0.255 (0.13–0.34)
2 1.85 (0.82) 2.00 (0.88)
IADL 1 3.46 (0.49) 3.43 (0.57) 0.502 0.133 (0.04–0.17)
2 3.47 (0.50) 3.48 (0.56)

1 p-value for the Time x Condition interaction effect adjusted for cluster effect, age of carer, effect of caring on work, diagnosis of patient, length of palliative care, length of Silver Chain admission

2 Cohen’s d

3 Higher scores indicate greater strain, stress and tasks assisting the patient

4 Higher scores indicate greater wellness.

* p < 0.01