Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Dec 29;29(1):34–48. doi: 10.1037/adb0000047

Table 1.

Study Design Characteristics (N = 12,630)

Study Representative Reference Intervention1 College Campus 1st Year (%) Men (%) White (%) N N at Follow-up
1 mo. 2 mo. 3-4 mo. 6 mo. 9-12 mo.
Mandated College Students
1 White, Mun, Pugh, and Morgan (2007) BMI, WF Large Public U. in the Northeast US 62 60 73 348 319 219

2 White, Mun, and Morgan (2008) WF, Delayed WF Large Public U. in the Northeast US 63 71 69 230 199 1062

3 Barnett, Murphy, Colby, and Monti (2007) BMI, AE Large Private U. in the Northeast US 67 49 66 225 206 211

4 Cimini et al. (2009) Group MI, Group Theatrical Presentation, AE Large Public U. in the Northeast US 49 62 80 682 471 430

5 LaBrie, Lamb, Pedersen, and Quinlan (2006) Group BMI Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US 71 60 74 167 158 148 139 125

6 LaBrie, Thompson, Huchting, Lac, and Buckley (2007) Group BMI Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US 49 0 58 115 110 110 110

7.1 Fromme and Corbin (2004) Peer/Professional LMC, Control Large Public U. in the Southern US 58 76 75 124 106 613

Volunteer College Students
7.2 Fromme and Corbin (2004) Peer/Professional LMC, Control Large Public U. in the Southern US 38 59 59 452 332 221

8a Larimer et al. (2007) Feedback, Control Mid-sized Public U. in the Northwest US 40 35 86 1,486 1,122

8b Larimer et al. (2007) Feedback, Control Large Public U. in the Northwest US 37 41 64 2,155 1,618

8c Larimer et al. (2007) Feedback, Control Small Public C. in the Northwest US 22 34 83 600 304

Volunteer 1st-year or Incoming College Students
10.2 Baer, Kivlahan, Blume, McKnight, and Marlatt (2001) Non-High-Risk Control Large Public U. in the Northwest US 100 41 78 87 81

11 Walters, Vader, and Harris (2007) Feedback, Control Large Public U. in the Southern US 100 59 64 383 272 288

15 LaBrie, Huchting, et al. (2008) Group BMI, Control Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US 100 0 56 263 261 260 258

16 LaBrie et al. (2009) Group BMI, Control Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US 100 0 57 287 282 277 268 250

17 LaBrie, Pedersen, Lamb, and Quinlan (2007) Group BMI Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US 100 100 65 120 110 105 90 56

22 Wood et al. (2010) BMI, BMI + PBI, Control Large Public U. in the Northeast US 100 43 87 758 687

Volunteer Heavy Drinking College Students
9 Lee, Kaysen, Neighbor, Kilmer, and Larimer (2009) AE, ASTP, BASICS, Choices, Web BASICS, Control Large Public U. in the Northwest US 100 38 71 604 504 485

10.1 Baer et al. (2001) BASICS, Control Large Public U. in the Northwest US 100 46 84 348 322

12 Wood et al. (2007) EC, BMI, Feedback + BMI, Control Large Public U. in the Northeast US 4 47 91 335 276 257 258

13 Murphy, Benson, and Vuchinich (2004) BMI, Feedback Large Public U. in the Southern US 13 32 94 54 51

14 Murphy et al. (2001) AE, BMI, Control Large Public U. in the Southern US 41 46 94 84 79 79

21 Walters, Vader, Harris, Field, and Jouriles (2009); Walters, Vader, Harris, and Jouriles (2009) BMI, BMI without Feedback, Feedback, Control Mid-sized Private U. in the Southern US 41 35 84 288 261 252 251

Intercollegiate Student Athletes or Fraternity, Sorority, and Service Organization Members
18 Martens, Kilmer, Beck, and Zamboanga (2010) Targeted Feedback, Standard Feedback, AE Two Small Private C. in the Northwest and Northeast US, Large Public U. in the Midwest US 32 26 85 329 289 259

19 LaBrie, Hummer, Neighbors, and Pedersen (2008) Group-specific Feedback, Control Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US 19 31 67 1,178 966 922

20 Larimer et al. (2001) BASICS, Control Large Public U. in the Northwest US 78 52 84 928 631

Notes. U. = University. C. = College

1

Intervention is labeled as originally described in the published study (see Table S1 for new labels for intervention groups; see Ray et al., in press for the content analysis of BMIs). BMI = Brief Motivational Interviewing; WF = Written Feedback; AE = Alcohol Education; LMC = Lifestyle Management Class; BASICS = Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students; ASTP = Alcohol Skills Training Program; EC = Expectancy Challenge; PBI = Parent-based Intervention. For ease of comparison, many conditions were relabeled based on key design features, and this information is provided in the Online Supplement.

2

The delayed WF group (n = 119) received feedback at 2 months post baseline and thus their follow-up data at 6 months post baseline were excluded

3

Mandated students who were in the control group (n = 24) received LMC at 1 month post baseline and their follow-up data at 6 month post baseline were excluded. Follow-up sample sizes were based on selective alcohol use measures and could differ from those reported in published articles.