Table 1.
Study | Representative Reference | Intervention1 | College Campus | 1st Year (%) | Men (%) | White (%) | N |
N at Follow-up |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 mo. | 2 mo. | 3-4 mo. | 6 mo. | 9-12 mo. | ||||||||
Mandated College Students | ||||||||||||
1 | White, Mun, Pugh, and Morgan (2007) | BMI, WF | Large Public U. in the Northeast US | 62 | 60 | 73 | 348 | 319 | 219 | |||
2 | White, Mun, and Morgan (2008) | WF, Delayed WF | Large Public U. in the Northeast US | 63 | 71 | 69 | 230 | 199 | 1062 | |||
3 | Barnett, Murphy, Colby, and Monti (2007) | BMI, AE | Large Private U. in the Northeast US | 67 | 49 | 66 | 225 | 206 | 211 | |||
4 | Cimini et al. (2009) | Group MI, Group Theatrical Presentation, AE | Large Public U. in the Northeast US | 49 | 62 | 80 | 682 | 471 | 430 | |||
5 | LaBrie, Lamb, Pedersen, and Quinlan (2006) | Group BMI | Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US | 71 | 60 | 74 | 167 | 158 | 148 | 139 | 125 | |
6 | LaBrie, Thompson, Huchting, Lac, and Buckley (2007) | Group BMI | Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US | 49 | 0 | 58 | 115 | 110 | 110 | 110 | ||
7.1 | Fromme and Corbin (2004) | Peer/Professional LMC, Control | Large Public U. in the Southern US | 58 | 76 | 75 | 124 | 106 | 613 | |||
Volunteer College Students | ||||||||||||
7.2 | Fromme and Corbin (2004) | Peer/Professional LMC, Control | Large Public U. in the Southern US | 38 | 59 | 59 | 452 | 332 | 221 | |||
8a | Larimer et al. (2007) | Feedback, Control | Mid-sized Public U. in the Northwest US | 40 | 35 | 86 | 1,486 | 1,122 | ||||
8b | Larimer et al. (2007) | Feedback, Control | Large Public U. in the Northwest US | 37 | 41 | 64 | 2,155 | 1,618 | ||||
8c | Larimer et al. (2007) | Feedback, Control | Small Public C. in the Northwest US | 22 | 34 | 83 | 600 | 304 | ||||
Volunteer 1st-year or Incoming College Students | ||||||||||||
10.2 | Baer, Kivlahan, Blume, McKnight, and Marlatt (2001) | Non-High-Risk Control | Large Public U. in the Northwest US | 100 | 41 | 78 | 87 | 81 | ||||
11 | Walters, Vader, and Harris (2007) | Feedback, Control | Large Public U. in the Southern US | 100 | 59 | 64 | 383 | 272 | 288 | |||
15 | LaBrie, Huchting, et al. (2008) | Group BMI, Control | Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US | 100 | 0 | 56 | 263 | 261 | 260 | 258 | ||
16 | LaBrie et al. (2009) | Group BMI, Control | Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US | 100 | 0 | 57 | 287 | 282 | 277 | 268 | 250 | |
17 | LaBrie, Pedersen, Lamb, and Quinlan (2007) | Group BMI | Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US | 100 | 100 | 65 | 120 | 110 | 105 | 90 | 56 | |
22 | Wood et al. (2010) | BMI, BMI + PBI, Control | Large Public U. in the Northeast US | 100 | 43 | 87 | 758 | 687 | ||||
Volunteer Heavy Drinking College Students | ||||||||||||
9 | Lee, Kaysen, Neighbor, Kilmer, and Larimer (2009) | AE, ASTP, BASICS, Choices, Web BASICS, Control | Large Public U. in the Northwest US | 100 | 38 | 71 | 604 | 504 | 485 | |||
10.1 | Baer et al. (2001) | BASICS, Control | Large Public U. in the Northwest US | 100 | 46 | 84 | 348 | 322 | ||||
12 | Wood et al. (2007) | EC, BMI, Feedback + BMI, Control | Large Public U. in the Northeast US | 4 | 47 | 91 | 335 | 276 | 257 | 258 | ||
13 | Murphy, Benson, and Vuchinich (2004) | BMI, Feedback | Large Public U. in the Southern US | 13 | 32 | 94 | 54 | 51 | ||||
14 | Murphy et al. (2001) | AE, BMI, Control | Large Public U. in the Southern US | 41 | 46 | 94 | 84 | 79 | 79 | |||
21 | Walters, Vader, Harris, Field, and Jouriles (2009); Walters, Vader, Harris, and Jouriles (2009) | BMI, BMI without Feedback, Feedback, Control | Mid-sized Private U. in the Southern US | 41 | 35 | 84 | 288 | 261 | 252 | 251 | ||
Intercollegiate Student Athletes or Fraternity, Sorority, and Service Organization Members | ||||||||||||
18 | Martens, Kilmer, Beck, and Zamboanga (2010) | Targeted Feedback, Standard Feedback, AE | Two Small Private C. in the Northwest and Northeast US, Large Public U. in the Midwest US | 32 | 26 | 85 | 329 | 289 | 259 | |||
19 | LaBrie, Hummer, Neighbors, and Pedersen (2008) | Group-specific Feedback, Control | Mid-sized Private U. in the Southwest US | 19 | 31 | 67 | 1,178 | 966 | 922 | |||
20 | Larimer et al. (2001) | BASICS, Control | Large Public U. in the Northwest US | 78 | 52 | 84 | 928 | 631 |
Notes. U. = University. C. = College
Intervention is labeled as originally described in the published study (see Table S1 for new labels for intervention groups; see Ray et al., in press for the content analysis of BMIs). BMI = Brief Motivational Interviewing; WF = Written Feedback; AE = Alcohol Education; LMC = Lifestyle Management Class; BASICS = Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students; ASTP = Alcohol Skills Training Program; EC = Expectancy Challenge; PBI = Parent-based Intervention. For ease of comparison, many conditions were relabeled based on key design features, and this information is provided in the Online Supplement.
The delayed WF group (n = 119) received feedback at 2 months post baseline and thus their follow-up data at 6 months post baseline were excluded
Mandated students who were in the control group (n = 24) received LMC at 1 month post baseline and their follow-up data at 6 month post baseline were excluded. Follow-up sample sizes were based on selective alcohol use measures and could differ from those reported in published articles.