Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2015 Mar 2;29(2):191–200. doi: 10.1037/fam0000070

Table 2.

Fit Indices and Variance Explained for Each Model

Model χ2 df p-
value
SRMR CFI TLI RMSEA
[90% CI]
R2
PK
R2
Substance
Mother Models
Model 1: Mom-reported PK
  Measurement Model 57.79 48 .16 .04 .99 .99 .03 [.00, .06]
  Structural Model 65.60 58 .23 .05 .99 .99 .03 [.00, .05] .18 .28
Model 2: Teen-reported PK
  Measurement Model 68.41 59 .19 .04 .99 .99 .03 [.00, .05]
  Structural Model 82.19 70 .15 .05 .99 .99 .03 [.00, .05] .10 .25
Father Models
Model 3: Dad-reported PK
  Measurement Model 65.69 48 .05 .04 .98 .98 .04 [.01, .07]
  Structural Model 115.16 91 .04 .05 .97 .97 .04 [.01, .07] .21 .22
Model 4: Teen-reported PK
  Measurement Model 73.24 59 .10 .04 .99 .98 .03 [.00, .06]
  Structural Model 92.83 70 .04 .05 .98 .97 .04 [.01, .06] .17 .29