Table 1. Diamino acid identification in the Murchison meteorite.
Diamino acid | Mass trace, amu | Retention time, min | Quantity, ppb |
---|---|---|---|
(2,5-Diaminopyrrole) | 168, 96 | 26.10 | 39.5 ± 3.7 |
4,4′-Diaminoisopentanoic acid | 142, 116 | 27.79 | 32.2 ± 3.3 |
d-2,3-diaminopropanoic acid | 175, 129, 102 | 28.92 | 49.9 ± 4.2 |
l-2,3-diaminopropanoic acid | 175, 129, 102 | 29.69 | 49.8 ± 4.2 |
d-2,4-diaminobutanoic acid | 175, 116 | 32.47 | 31.6 ± 3.3 |
3,3′-Diaminoisobutanoic acid | 188, 142, 115 | 32.58 | 48.6 ± 4.1 |
l-2,4-diaminobutanoic acid | 175, 116 | 33.06 | 29.9 ± 3.2 |
d-ornithine | 142, 129 | 43.26 | <5 |
l-ornithine | 142, 129 | 44.54 | <5 |
2,3-Diaminobutanoic acid* | 203, 157, 85 | 38.62 | 89.9 ± 6.2 |
(A-unidentified)*† | 216 | 20.19 | 7.1 ± 2.0 |
(B-unidentified)*† | 216 | 20.39 | 7.2 ± 2.0 |
Numbers shown in boldface are the main mass fragments. ppb, parts per billion, i.e., ng analyte per g Murchison. The diamino acid quantities were calculated by comparison of the peak areas with external diamino acid standards. The uncertainties were calculated from a calibration of the analytical procedure.
Gas chromatograms taken in deviation from the standard protocol on 12-m Chirasil-l-Val stationary phase, with oven temperature programmed for 3 min at 70°C, 5°C·min-1, and 17.5 min at 180°C
A, the first eluting enantiomer; B, the second eluting enantiomer of a hitherto unidentified structure, most likely a diamino acid