Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):70–76. doi: 10.5935/1678-741.20140093

Table 1.

Echocardiographic morphology parameters for female and male rats post-MI

  Female Male
  Week 1 Week 1 Week 6 Week 6 Week 1 Week 1 Week 6 Week 6
  Sham MI Sham MI Sham MI Sham MI
MI size(%) ---- 44±5 ---- 42±9 ---- 42±3 ---- 42±7
SLA (mm) 4±0.5 4.9±11 4±0.2 6±1*# 3±0.5 5±1* 3±0.4 6±1*#
SLA/BW(mm/g) 0.02± 0.001 0.02±0.0005* 0.02±0.002 0.03±0.003* 0.01±0.002 0.02±0.0005* 0.01±0.0003 0.02±0.002*
LVDD(mm) 5±0.5 8±0.5* 5±1 9±1*# 4±1 9±1* 5±1 10±0.01*#
LVDD/BW(mm/g) 0.03± 0.002 0.04±0.003* 0.03±0.001 0.04±0.01* 0.03±0.001 0.04±0.005* 0.03±0.002 0.03±0.005*
LVSD(mm) 2±0.3 6±1* 3±1 7±1*# 2±1 7±0.3* 3±1 8±0.3*#
LVSD/BW(mm/g) 0.02± 0.002 0.03±0.0004* 0.02±0.0001 0.03±0.01* 0.02±0.0001 0.03±0.005* 0.02±0.0002 0.03±0.005*

MI=myocardial infarction; BW=body weight; SLA=left atrium size; LVDD=left ventricle diastolic diameter; LVSD=left ventricle systolic diameter Data are shown as means±SD. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were applied for comparisons.

*

P<0.05 vs. Sham on first and sixth week.

#

P<0.05 vs. MI on first week