Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 15;44(2):93–99. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2014.932432

Table 3.

Results from the backwards stepwise logistic regression for each potential correlate for the mFABQ.

OR (95% CI) p-value
Sex (male vs. female) 1.55 (1.26–1.91) < 0.001
Income (below vs. above average) 1.35 (1.12–1.63) 0.002
Health, VAS (moderate vs. good) 1.44 (1.13–1.83) 0.003
Health, VAS (poor vs. good 1.59 (1.10–2.29) 0.013
Pain, VAS (moderate vs. low) 1.65 (1.26–2.17) < 0.001
Pain, VAS (high vs. low) 1.99 (1.40–2.84) < 0.001
EQ-5D (high vs. low) 0.44 (0.35–0.55) < 0.001
EQ-5D, VAS (high vs. low) 0.56 (0.45–0.71) < 0.001
ESES (moderate vs. low) 1.15 (0.91–1.44) 0.242
ESES (high vs. low) 0.66 (0.52–0.82) < 0.001

Nagelkerke's R2= 0.27.

mFABQ, Modified Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VAS, visual analogue scale; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5 dimension; ESES, Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale.