96.4 |
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, p. 399 |
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) |
96.1 |
Study also reports 90% sensitivity |
Swensen et al. (2003) |
95.5 |
106 false positives among 111 with nodules >0.5 cm |
Tiitola et al. (2002) |
92.9–96.0 |
Rates depended on nodule size, p. 260. |
Swensen et al. (2005) |
86.6–96.4 |
Rates depend upon assumed nodule size from 5.0 to 9.0 mm |
Henschke et al. (2013) |
94.6 |
Based on 14 detected cancers among 259 patients with abnormal CT scans |
McWilliams et al. (2003) |
94.1 |
From Table 2, 1773 false positives among 1883 nodules detected |
Mahadevia et al. (2003) |
93 |
Based on 8 lung cancers among 114 subjects with nodules >5 mm |
Novello et al. (2005) |
92.6 |
Based on 22 lung cancers among 298 patients with nodules |
Pastorino et al. (2003) |
92.1 |
Based on 22 cancers in 279 with suspicious nodules |
Sone et al. (2001) |
88.5–97 |
From Table 3, rate dependent upon risk |
Kovalchik et al. (2013) |
87.6 |
Based on 29 malignancies among 233 positive results |
Henschke et al. (2002) |
75 |
Percent of patients with non-calcified nodules on CT |
Manos (2013) |
73.4 |
Based on 163 benign nodules among 222 evaluated by thin section CT |
Li et al. (2004) |
>70 |
Reported value derived from Mayo clinic and ELCAP trials |
Patz et al. (2004) |
62.1 |
Based on 18 false positives among 29 subjects; for nodules >10 mm |
Diedrerich et al. (2002) |
43.75 |
Based on 36 confirmed lung cancer cases among 64 patients |
Nawa et al. (2002) |
21–33 |
Rates depend upon number of tests, p. 509. Of participants with a false-positive CT scan, 7% had an unnecessary invasive procedure and 2% had major surgery for benign disease. |
Croswell et al. (2010) |
19 |
p. 119 |
Gohagan et al. (2004) |
7.9 |
p. 612. Includes multi-stage process with classification of nodules by size and calcification with follow-up. |
Pedersen et al. (2009), Saghir et al. (2012)
|
7.9 M/5.6 F |
Sensitivity reported to range between 84.6% W to 90.6% M |
Toyoda et al. (2008) |
1.7 |
Sensitivity reported at 94.6%, based on Volume CT scanning |
van Klaveren et al. (2009) |