Table A1.
Table of test specificity and sensitivity results in the literature.
References | Test Information | Specificity | Sensitivity | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Menon et al. (2009) | Multi-modal and ultrasound for ovarian cancer; primary ovarian and tubal | 0.998 | 0.894 | ||
Primary invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal | 0.998 | 0.895 | |||
USS | 0.982 | 0.75 | |||
Citing van Nagell et al. (2007) | 0.987 | 0.763 | |||
Grim et al. (1979) | Renal vascular hypertension screening test | 0.92 | 0.93 | ||
Weiss et al. (1985) | HTLV-III (AIDS Agent) screening test | 0.986 | 0.973 | ||
Stoll et al. (1999) | PTSD screening test | 0.975 | 0.77 | ||
Kulasingam et al. (2002) | HPV testing thin-layer pap | 0.824 | 0.613 | ||
PCR | 0.788 | 0.882 | |||
Signal amplification | 0.726 | 0.908 | |||
Perkins et al. (2001) | Peripheral neuropathy in Diabetes clinic | Vibration (on off) | 0.99 | 0.53 | |
Monofilament | 0.96 | 0.77 | |||
Superficial pain | 0.97 | 0.59 | |||
Vibration (timed) | 0.98 | 0.8 | |||
Deeks & Altman (2004) | Obstructive airway disease and >40 pack-years smoking | 0.986 | 0.284 | ||
Doobay & Anand (2005) | ABI and stroke | CHD | Newman et al. (1999) | 0.908 | 0.163 |
Abbott et al. (2000) | 0.944 | 0.167 | |||
Stroke | Newman et al. (1999) | 0.908 | 0.17 | ||
Abbott et al. (2000) | 0.887 | 0.22 | |||
Tsai et al. (2001) | 0.972 | 0.092 | |||
Schiffman et al. (2000) | HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer | 0.942 | 0.771 | ||
0.934 | 0.748 | ||||
Mayrand et al. (2007) | HPV for cervical cancer (conservative case) | 0.941 | 0.946 | ||
Pap for cervical cancer (conservative case) | 0.968 | 0.554 | |||
Sabroe et al. (1999) | Autologous serum skin tests to screen for chronic idiopathic urticaria | 0.81 | 0.65 | ||
0.78 | 0.71 | ||||
Maisel et al. (2001) | B-natriuretic peptide for left ventricular dysfunction, 75 pg/mL BNP level | 0.98 | 0.86 | ||
Shumway-Cook et al. (2000) | Probability of falls by timed up and go test | 0.87 | 0.87 | ||
Ferreira et al. (1992) | Endomysial antibody screening for coeliac disease, four tests | 0.99 | 1 | ||
0.99 | 0.91 | ||||
0.85 | 0.91 | ||||
0.88 | 0.76 | ||||
Watson et al. (2002) | Various tests for Chlamydia | PCR cervix | 1 | 0.965 | |
LCR urine | 1 | 0.875 | |||
EIA urine | 1 | 0.188 | |||
EIA cervix | 1 | 0.52 | |||
EIA cervix | 0.99 | 0.8 | |||
DNA probe | 0.96 | 0.72 | |||
LET urine | 0.808 | 0.778 | |||
EIA urine | 0.99 | 0.75 | |||
EIA cervix | 1 | 0.844 | |||
PCR cervix | 1 | 1 | |||
LCR urine | 1 | 0.96 | |||
EIA urine | 1 | 0.37 | |||
EIA cervix | 1 | 0.783 | |||
PCR cervix | 1 | 1 | |||
PCR cervix | 1 | 0.85 | |||
PCR cervix | 1 | 0.953 | |||
PCR cervix | 0.986 | 1 | |||
PCR urine | 0.986 | 0.923 | |||
LCR cervix | 0.997 | 0.886 | |||
PCR, EIA cervix | 0.997 | 0.97 | |||
LET | 0.91 | 0.41 | |||
LCR and LET urine | 0.949 | 0.589 | |||
PCR urine | 0.997 | 0.82 | |||
PCR cervix | 0.998 | 0.82 | |||
PACE2 cervix | 1 | 0.795 | |||
PCR urine | 0.99 | 0.85 | |||
DFA cervix | 0.96 | 0.85 | |||
LCR urine | 1 | 0.882 | |||
EIA | 1 | 0.84 | |||
PCR cervix | 0.998 | 0.992 | |||
LCR, PCR | 1 | 0.93 | |||
LCR, PCR | 0.996 | 0.62 | |||
DFA cervix | 0.995 | 0.778 | |||
PCR cervix | 1 | 0.714 | |||
EIA cervix | 1 | 0.647 | |||
PCR urine | 0.993 | 0.895 | |||
Arbyn et al. (2008) | Five cervical cancer screening tests (Table 3) | VIA | 0.836 | 0.887 | |
VILI | 0.832 | 0.957 | |||
VIAM | 0.855 | 0.826 | |||
Pap Smear | 0.985 | 0.651 | |||
HC2 | 0.93 | 0.721 | |||
Legro et al. (1998) | Fasting glucose to insulin ratio to measure insulin sensitivity | 0.84 | 0.95 | ||
Schroeder et al. (1999) | Noninvasive determination of endothelium-mediated vasodilation | Coronary artery disease | 0.81 | 0.71 | |
Angina pectoris | 0.571 | 0.824 | |||
Allison et al. (1996) | Four tests for colorectal-screening | Hemoccult II | 0.981 | 0.324 | |
Hemoccult II Sensa | 0.875 | 0.712 | |||
Hemoselect | 0.952 | 0.672 | |||
Combined | 0.979 | 0.537 | |||
Ewer et al. (2011) | Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects | Critical cases | 0.9912 | 0.75 | |
All major cases | 0.9916 | 0.4906 | |||
Boppana et al. (2011) | Saliva polymerase chain reaction assay for cytomegalovirus | Liquid Saliva | 0.999 | 1 | |
Dried Saliva | 0.999 | 0.974 | |||
Whitlock et al. (2008) | Several colorectal cancer screening tests | 0.94 | 0.85 | ||
0.944 | 0.688 | ||||
0.91 | 0.875 | ||||
0.949 | 0.865 | ||||
0.831 | 0.667 | ||||
0.969 | 0.818 | ||||
0.971 | 0.556 | ||||
0.956 | 0.909 | ||||
Cuzick et al. (2013) | Six human papillomavirus tests | BD HPV | 0.843 | 0.975 | |
Roche Cobas | 0.845 | 0.975 | |||
Qiagen Hybrid | 0.854 | 0.975 | |||
Abbott real time | 0.872 | 0.95 | |||
Gen-probe | 0.902 | 0.975 | |||
NorChip | 0.952 | 0.714 | |||
Donovan et al. (2013) | Various tests for gestational diabetes | 50-G OGCT | 0.86 | 0.85 | |
50-G OGCT | 0.84 | 0.88 | |||
50-G OGCT | 0.83 | 0.85 | |||
50-G OGCT | 0.69 | 0.81 | |||
50-G OGCT | 0.89 | 0.7 | |||
50-G OGCT | 0.77 | 0.99 | |||
50-G OGCT | 0.66 | 0.88 | |||
50-G OGCT | 1 | 0.17 | |||
Fasting plasma glucose | 0.52 | 0.87 | |||
Fasting plasma glucose | 0.76 | 0.77 | |||
Fasting plasma glucose | 0.92 | 0.76 | |||
Fasting plasma glucose | 0.93 | 0.54 | |||
HbA 1c | 0.28 | 0.92 | |||
HbA 1c | 0.97 | 0.12 | |||
HbA 1c | 0.61 | 0.86 | |||
HbA 1c | 0.21 | 0.82 | |||
Ng et al. (2013) | MRI and mammographic screening in survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma | Mammogram | 0.93 | 0.68 | |
MRI | 0.94 | 0.67 | |||
Both | 0.9 | 0.94 | |||
Jafari et al. (2013) | Various tests for syphilis (imperfect reference) | ||||
Determine | Serum | 0.9415 | 0.9004 | ||
Whole Blood | 0.9585 | 0.8632 | |||
SD Bioline | Serum | 0.9585 | 0.8706 | ||
Whole Blood | 0.9795 | 0.845 | |||
Syphicheck | Serum | 0.9914 | 0.7448 | ||
Whole Blood | 0.9958 | 0.7447 | |||
Visitect | Serum | 0.9645 | 0.8513 | ||
Whole Blood | 0.9943 | 0.7426 | |||
Salami et al. (2013) | Various tests for prostate cancer | Optimized | 0.9 | 0.8 | |
Kloten et al. (2013) | Various tests for blood-based breast cancer screening | RASSF1A UTIH5 | 0.73 | 0.54 | |
RASSF1A DKK3 | 0.75 | 0.59 | |||
DKK3 ITIH5 | 0.94 | 0.4 | |||
RASSF1A DKK3 ITH5 | 0.72 | 0.67 | |||
Firnhaber et al. (2013) | Cervical cancer screening methods in HIV positive women CIN 2+ | Cytology (MD intern) | 0.681 | 0.755 | |
HPV | 0.514 | 0.919 | |||
Cytology (RN intern) | 0.685 | 0.654 | |||
Teertstra et al. (2009) | Breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography for detection of cancer | Mammography | 0.883 | 0.963 | |
Tomosynthesis | 0.867 | 0.963 | |||
Rafferty et al. (2013) | Breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography for detection of cancer | Mammography | 0.841 | 0.655 | |
Mammography plus | 0.892 | 0.762 | |||
Tomosynthesis | 0.862 | 0.627 | |||
Mammography | 0.845 | 0.787 | |||
Mammography plus Tomosynthesis | |||||
Catalona et al. (1991) | Prostate-specific antigen in serum screening test | Rectal examination | 0.44 | 0.86 | |
Ultrasonography | 0.27 | 0.92 | |||
Serum PSA | 0.59 | 0.79 |