Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 2;16(6):1358–1365. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9673-9

Table III.

Dasatinib Pharmacokinetics in Ten Healthy Volunteers Following a 100 mg Oral Dose Given with and Without Gastric pH Modulators

Parameter DAS alone (treatment A) DAS + RAB (treatment B) DAS + RAB + BHCl (treatment C) Geometric mean ratios (90% CI)
B to A C to B C to A
Cmax (ng/mL) 115 ± 68 6.87 ± 3.57***;††† 103 ± 58 0.0757 (0.0342–0.168) 14.0 (7.7–25.4) 1.05 (0.48–2.30)
AUC0-22 (ng/mL*h) 395 ± 196 57.9 ± 28.7***;††† 379 ± 161 0.165 (0.090–0.303) 6.66 (4.23–10.5) 1.10 (0.623–1.92)
AUC0−∞ (ng/mL*h)a 405 ± 200 70.5 ± 24.8***;††† 469 ± 233 0.217 (0.113–0.417) 5.57 (3.81–8.14) 1.21 (0.671–2.17)
Tmax (h) 1.0 (1.0–4.0) 2.0 (1.5–12) 2.0 (0.50–4.0) N/A N/A N/A
CL/F (mL/min/kg) 107 ± 114 376 ± 127***;††† 67.8 ± 42.0 4.62 (2.41–8.85) 0.180 (0.123–0.264) 0.835 (0.470–1.48)
t1/2 (h) 4.43 ± 0.64 11.2 ± 7.2***;†† 5.29 ± 1.04 2.10 (1.42–3.11) 0.553 (0.391–0.781) 1.16 (1.03–1.31)

DAS dasatinib, RAB rabeprazole, BHCl betaine HCl, C max maximum plasma concentration, T max time to maximum plasma concentration, t 1/2 terminal half-life, AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve, CL/F oral clearance, N/A not available

Statistical results for treatment B versus A comparisons and Treatment C versus B comparisons are reported in each row of the Treatment B column. No significant differences were observed for all pharmacokinetic parameters in treatment C versus A comparisons, and in Tmax across all treatments

**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ††P < 0.01; †††P < 0.001

aData from one subject was excluded from analysis as the terminal phase of dasatinib pharmacokinetics could not be estimated