Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2013 May 29;119(17):3148–3155. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28144

Table 5. Multivariatea Cox Regression Analyses for MLKL, ERCC1 and RRM2 Expression in All Patients (n = 80).

Outcome OS

HR 95% CI Pb
Tumor size 1.032 0.789-1.350 .818
Positive surgical margins 1.447 0.889-2.355 .138
Higher grade 1.174 0.727-1.894 .512
Positive lymph nodes 1.619 0.866-3.028 .132
PNI 5.947 1.693-20.895 .005
LVI 1.331 0.734-2.412 .346
MLKL expressionc 11.4 3.4-27.9 <.001
ERCC1 expression 4.100 1.951-8.615 <.001
RRM2 expression 3.314 1.589-6.910 .001

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ERCC1, excision repair cross-complementing gene-1; HR, hazards ratio; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; MLKL, mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein; OS, overall survival; PNI, perineural invasion; RRM2, ribonucleotide reductase subunit M2.

a

Multivariate analysis includes all clinically relevant covariates found to have a P value <.2 on univariate analysis.

b

Bold type denotes statistical significance.

c

MLKL score is decreasing from high expression to low expression. ERCC1 and RRM2 expression are increasing from low overall score to high overall score.