Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Dec 13;132(3):560–565. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.016

Table 3.

PFS and OS of LGSC population by prognostic factors (multivariate analysis).

N Adj. HRa (PFS) P Adj. HRa (OS) P
Age years 189 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.769 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 0.838
Race/ethnicity
    White 172 Referent Referent
    Black 9 0.42 (0.19–0.92) 0.031 0.59 (0.21–1.66) 0.317
    Other 8 0.65 (0.28–1.48) 0.304 1.32 (0.54–3.24) 0.538
Performance status
    0 93 Referent Referent
    1–2 87 1.26 (0.90–1.78) 0.181 1.47 (1.00–2.17) 0.048
    3 9 0.84(0.40–1.78) 0.648 1.16 (0.53–2.53) 0.719
FIGO stage
    III 165 Referent Referent
    IV 24 1.30 (0.81–2.08) 0.282 1.04 (0.61–1.76) 0.890
Baseline CA-125U/mL 184 1.11 (0.97–1.27) 0.137 1.13 (0.98–1.30) 0.094
Ascites
    No 69 Referent Referent
    Yes 118 1.21 (0.81–1.80) 0.344 1.18 (0.76–1.82) 0.465
Residual disease status
    Microscopic 47 Referent Referent
    0.1–1.0 cm 97 3.13 (1.96–4.98) <0.001 2.31 (1.37–3.90) 0.002
    >1.0 cm 45 3.31 (1.87–5.85) <0.001 2.45 (1.30–4.64) 0.006

Tests used

Wald test.

a

Hazard ratios (HR) are unitless. HRs are followed by their 95% confidence intervals.