Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Sep;45(3):361–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00396.x

TABLE 4.

Odds ratios from random-effects logistic regression models predicting changes among men’s family-size preferences over time, Balaka, Malawi, 2009–11

Upward movement
(versus no change)
Downward movemen
(versus no change)
Characteristic Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Individual
 Years of education 0.94** 0.95** 0.96** 0.97*
 Age 1.02 1.02 1.01 1.02
 Number of living children 1.29** 1.26** 0.89 0.87
 Religion
  Catholic (r) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Muslim 1.43 1.11 1.61 1.62 a
  Mission Protestant 1.27 1.14 0.88 0.97
  Pentecostal 1.03 0.99 1.28 1.26
  New Mission Protestant 1.00 0.85 1.68 b 1.61 c
  Other (mostly AIC) 1.38 1.38 1.43 1.18
 Household goods 0.94 0.95 0.92 0.93
Partner
 Years of education 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.98
 Age 1.01 1.00 1.05 1.02
 Number of living children 1.01 1.01 1.06 1.06
 Religion
  Catholic (r) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Muslim 1.32 1.37 1.05 0.94
  Mission Protestant 1.17 1.20 1.10 0.98
  Pentecostal 1.11 1.08 0.78 0.77
  New Mission Protestant 1.23 1.30 1.05 0.94
  Other (mostly AIC) 0.97 0.92 1.19 1.18
 Household goods 1.05 1.02 1.06 1.06
Couple
 Relationship length in months 0.996 d 0.996* 0.996 0.997 d
 Married 0.74 0.71 0.93 0.93
Relative preference
 Same (r) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Partner’s preferences are lower 0.64* 0.97 3.69** 2.48**
 Partner’s preferences are higher 3.84** 2.40** 0.44** 0.60**
Change between previous two interviews
 No change (r) 1.00 1.00
 Upward 0.47* 4.81**
 Downward 6.43** 0.59
Rho 0.26 0.06 0.24 0.08
N (couple-waves) (3,000) (3,000) (2,931) (2,931)
N (couples) (742) (742) (740) (740)
*

Significant at p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01.

(r) = Reference category. AIC = African Independent Churches.

a

p = 0.054.

b

p = 0.084.

c

p = 0.065.

d

p = 0.090.