Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2009 Sep 16;182(5):2274–2278. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.024

Table 2.

Radical prostatectomy findings

Mean gm RP (range) 75.5 (34.3-152.8)
No./total No. GS (%):
    6 19/48 (39.6)
    6 With tertiary pattern 4 6/48 (12.5)
    3 + 4 = 7 15/48 (31.3)
    4 + 3 = 7 6/48 (12.5)
    Greater than 7 2/48 (4.2)
No./total No. organ confined (%) 31/48 (65)
No./total No. EPE (%):
    Focal 7/48 (14.6)
    Nonfocal 10/48 (20.8)
No./total No. seminal vesicle involvement (%) 1/48 (2.1)
No./total No. lymph node involvement (%) 2/48 (4.2)
No./total No. pos margins (%) 7/48 (15)
Mean cm3 total tumor vol (range) 1.3 (0.02-10.8)
No./total No. total tumor vol less than 1 cm3 (%) 33/48 (68)
Mean cm3 dominant tumor nodule vol (range) 1.03 (0.01-10.57)
No./total No. dominant tumor nodule vol greater than 1 cm3 (%) 10/48 (20.8)